bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
And the best task is ...? Using Task potency to infer task specificity
Roselyne J. ChauviniD, Maarten MennesiD, Alberto LleraiD, Jan K. BuitelaariD, Christian F. BeckmanniD
Abstract
When an individual engages in a task, the associated evoked activities build upon already ongoing activity, itself shaped by an underlying functional connectivity baseline (Fox et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2009; Tavor et al., 2016). To facilitate understanding the building blocks of cognition we incorporate the idea that task-induced functional connectivity modulation with respect to its underlying resting state functional connectivity is task-specific. Here, we introduce a framework incorporating task potency, providing direct access to task-specificity through enabling direct comparison between task paradigms. In particular, to study functional connectivity modulations related to cognitive involvement in a task we define task potency as the amplitude of connectivity modulations away from the brains baseline functional connectivity architecture as observed during a resting state acquisition. We demonstrate the use of our framework by comparing three tasks (visuo-spatial working memory, reward processing, and stop signal task) available within a large cohort. Using task potency, we demonstrate that cognitive operations are supported by a common baseline of within-network interactions, supplemented by connections between large-scale networks in order to solve a specific task.\n\nHighlights- Task potency framework defines modulation of functional connectivity away from baseline resting state\n- More within-than between-network modulations are induced by task performance\n- Between-network modulations are task-specific\n- Edges modulated by multiple tasks are mostly within-network\n- The task potency can be used to define the most potent task
- organism: human
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identifying a task-invariant cognitive reserve network using task potency
Anna Catharina van Loenhoud, Christian Georg Habeck, … Yaakov Stern·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2020
- The functional relevance of task-state functional connectivity
Michael W. Cole, Takuya Ito, … Rubén Sánchez-Romero·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2021
- Similarity in evoked responses does not imply similarity in macroscopic network states across tasks
Javier Rasero, Richard F. Betzel, … Timothy Verstynen·Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience (CCN)Peer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Static and dynamic measures of human brain connectivity predict complementary aspects of human cognitive performance
Aurora I. Ramos-Nuñez, Simon Fischer‐Baum, … Michael W. Deem·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2017
- Task-Evoked Functional Connectivity Does Not Explain Functional Connectivity Differences Between Rest and Task Conditions
Lauren K. Lynch, Kun‐Han Lu, … Zhongming Liu·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2018
- Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations
Michael W Cole, Takuya Ito, … Douglas H Schultz·bioRxiv·May 24, 2016