The trade-off between grain weight and grain number in wheat is explained by the overlapping of the key phases determining these major yield components

Enhancing grain yield is a primary goal in the cultivation of major staple crops, including wheat. Recent research has focused on identifying the physiological and molecular factors that influence grain weight, a critical determinant of crop yield. However, a bottleneck has arisen due to the trade-off between grain weight and grain number, whose underlying causes remain elusive. In a novel approach, a wheat expansin gene, TaExpA6, known for its expression in root tissues, was engineered to express in the grains of the spring wheat cultivar Fielder. This modification led to increases in both grain weight and yield without adversely affecting grain number. Conversely, a triple mutant line targeting the gene TaGW2, a known negative regulator of grain weight, resulted in increased grain weight but decreased grain number, potentially offsetting yield gains. This study aimed to evaluate four wheat genotypes: (i) a transgenic line expressing TaExpA6, (ii) its wild-type counterpart (Fielder), (iii) a TaGW2 triple mutant line, and (iv) its wild-type. Conducted in southern Chile, the study employed a Complete Randomized Block Design with four replications, under well-managed field conditions including fertilization, irrigation, and pest control. The primary metrics assessed were grain yield, grain number, and average grain weight per spike, along with detailed measurements of grain weight and dimensions across the spike, and ovary weight at pollination (Waddingtons scale 10). The expression levels of TaExpA6 and TaGW2 were also monitored post-anthesis. Results indicated that both the TaExpA6 line and the triple mutant line achieved significantly higher average grain weights compared to their respective wild types. Notably, the TaExpA6 line did not exhibit a reduction in grain number, thereby enhancing grain yield per spike. In contrast, the triple mutant line showed a reduced grain number per spike, with no significant change in overall yield. Analysis of ovary size, grain weight dynamics, and gene expression patterns suggests that the trade-off between grain weight and number could be attributed to the overlapping of the critical periods for the determination of these traits.