Including imprecisely georeferenced specimens improves accuracy of species distribution models and estimates of niche breadth
Abstract
AimMuseum and herbarium specimen records are frequently used to assess species conservation status and responses to climate change. Typically, occurrences with imprecise geolocality information are discarded because they cannot be matched confidently to environmental conditions, and are thus expected to increase uncertainty in downstream analyses. However, using only precisely georeferenced records risks undersampling of species environmental and geographic distributions. We present two related methods to allow the use of imprecisely georeferenced occurrences in biogeographic analysis. InnovationOur two procedures assign imprecise records to the 1) locations or 2) climates that are closest to the geographic or environmental centroid of the precise records of a species. For virtual species, including imprecise records alongside precise records improved the accuracy of ecological niche models projected to the present and the future, especially for species with ~20 or fewer precise occurrences. Using only precise records underestimates loss in suitable habitat and overestimates the amount of suitable habitat in both the present and future. Including imprecise records also improves estimates of niche breadth and extent of occurrence. An analysis of 44 species of North American Asclepias (Apocynaceae) yielded similar results. Main conclusionsExisting studies examining the effects of spatial imprecision compare outcomes based on precise records to the same records with spatial error added to them. However, in real-world cases, analysts possess a mix of precise and imprecise records and must decide whether to retain or discard the latter. Discarding imprecise records can undersample species geographic and environmental distributions and lead to mis-estimation of responses to past and future climate change. Our method, for which we provide a software implementation in the enmSdmX package for R, is simple to employ and can help leverage the large number of specimen records that are typically deemed "unusable" because of spatial imprecision in their geolocation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatial bias in GBIF data has limited impact on plant climate niche properties in Europe
Thibault Coquery, Erik Welk, Lotte Korell·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2026
- Estimating the fundamental niche: accounting for the uneven availability of existing environmental conditions in the calibration area
L. Jimenez, J. Soberon·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2021
- Correcting and georeferencing natural history occurrence records with calibrated uncertainty
Ann Raiho, Emmy Spadaro, … S. Blair Hedges·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2026
- Shifted distribution baselines: neglecting long-term biodiversity records risks overlooking potentially suitable habitat for conservation management
S. Monsarrat, P. Novellie, … G. I. H. Kerley·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2019
- Modelling the distribution of rare invertebrates by correcting class imbalance and spatial bias
W. B. Gaul, D. Sadykova, … J. M. Yearsley·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2022
- Assessment and representation of variability in ecological niche model predictions
Marlon E. Cobos, Luis Osorio‐Olvera, A. Townsend Peterson·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2019