bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Evidence of an optimal error rate for motor skill learning
Abstract
When acquiring a motor skill, learners must practice the skill at a difficulty that is challenging but still manageable to gradually improve their performance. In other words, during training, the learner must experience success as well as failure. Does there exist an optimal proportion of successes and failures to promote the fastest improvements in skill? Here, we build on a recent theoretical framework for optimal machine learning, extending it to the learning of motor skills. We then designed a custom task whose difficulty dynamically changed along with human subjects performance, constraining the error rate during training. In a large behavioral dataset (N=192), we observed evidence that learning is greatest at around a [~]30% error rate, matching our theoretical predictions.
- Citations
- 11
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Practice modifies the response to errors during a novel motor sequence learning task
Dhanush Rachaveti, Rajiv Ranganathan, Varadhan SKM·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2020
- The Impact of Different Learning Processes on Acquisition, Transfer, and Proprioception in Complex Motor Tasks
Reshma Babu, Hannah J. Block·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2025
- Learning vs. minding: How subjective costs can mask motor learning
Chadwick M. Healy, Max Berniker, Alaa A. Ahmed·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2023
- An implicit memory of errors limits human sensorimotor adaptation
Scott T. Albert, Jihoon Jang, … Reza Shadmehr·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2021
- Instrumental-Motor Transfer: The Relative Value of Competing Movement Goals Modulates Implicit Motor Learning
Naser Al-Fawakhiri, Vikram S. Chib, Samuel D. McDougle·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.
Xiaoyue Zhang, Wencheng Wu, Kunlin Wei·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026