Cell GenomicsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
MUSSEL: Enhanced Bayesian Polygenic Risk Prediction Leveraging Information across Multiple Ancestry Groups
Jin JiniD, Jianan ZhaniD, Jingning ZhangiD, Ruzhang ZhaoiD, Jared O’ConnelliD, Yunxuan JiangiD, Stella W. AslibekyaniD, Adam AutoniD, Elizabeth Babalola, Robert K. Bell, Jessica BielenbergiD, Katarzyna BryciD, Emily Bullis, Daniella CokeriD, Gabriel Cuéllar-PartidaiD, Devika Dhamija, Sayantan DasiD, Sarah L. ElsoniD, Nicholas ErikssoniD, Teresa Jenica FilshteiniD, Alison Fitch, Kipper Fletez‐BrantiD, Pierre FontanillasiD, Will FreymaniD, Julie M. GrankaiD, , Nilanjan ChatterjeeiD
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are now showing promising predictive performance on a wide variety of complex traits and diseases, but there exists a substantial performance gap across different populations. We propose MUSSEL, a method for ancestry-specific polygenic prediction that borrows information in the summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) across multiple ancestry groups. MUSSEL conducts Bayesian hierarchical modeling under a MUltivariate Spike-and-Slab model for effect-size distribution and incorporates an Ensemble Learning step using super learner to combine information across different tuning parameter settings and ancestry groups. In our simulation studies and data analyses of 16 traits across four distinct studies, totaling 5.7 million participants with a substantial ancestral diversity, MUSSEL shows promising performance compared to alternatives. The method, for example, has an average gain in prediction R2 across 11 continuous traits of 40.2% and 49.3% compared to PRS-CSx and CT-SLEB, respectively, in the African Ancestry population. The best-performing method, however, varies by GWAS sample size, target ancestry, underlying trait architecture, and the choice of reference samples for LD estimation, and thus ultimately, a combination of methods may be needed to generate the most robust PRS across diverse populations.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- approach: Bayesian inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 36
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An Ensemble Penalized Regression Method for Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Prediction
Jingning Zhang, Jianan Zhan, … Nilanjan Chatterjee·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2024
- Polygenic prediction across populations is influenced by ancestry, genetic architecture, and methodology
Ying Wang, Masahiro Kanai, … Alicia R. Martin·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2023
- A new method for multi-ancestry polygenic prediction improves performance across diverse populations
Haoyu Zhang, Jianan Zhan, … Nilanjan Chatterjee·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2023
- Improving Polygenic Prediction in Ancestrally Diverse Populations
Yunfeng Ruan, Kuang Lin, … Tian Ge·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2022
- BridgePRS: A powerful trans-ancestry Polygenic Risk Score method
Clive Hoggart, Shing Wan Choi, … Paul F. O’Reilly·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2023
- Polygenic Prediction via Bayesian Regression and Continuous Shrinkage Priors
Tian Ge, Chia‐Yen Chen, … Jordan W. Smoller·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2019