Nature GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Improving Polygenic Prediction in Ancestrally Diverse Populations
Yunfeng RuaniD, Kuang LiniD, Yen‐Chen Anne FengiD, Chia‐Yen CheniD, Max LamiD, Zhenglin Guo, Stanley Global Asia Initiatives, Yong Min AhniD, Kazufumi AkiyamaiD, Makoto AraiiD, Ji Hyun BaekiD, Wei J. CheniD, Young‐Chul ChungiD, Gang Feng, Kumiko FujiiiD, Stephen J. GlattiD, Kyooseob HaiD, Kotaro HattoriiD, Teruhiko HiguchiiD, Akitoyo HishimotoiD, Kyung Sue HongiD, Yasue HoriuchiiD, Hai‐Gwo HwuiD, Masashi IkedaiD, Sayuri Ishiwata, , Tian GeiD
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have attenuated cross-population predictive performance. As existing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were predominantly conducted in individuals of European descent, the limited transferability of PRS reduces its clinical value in non-European populations and may exacerbate healthcare disparities. Recent efforts to level ancestry imbalance in genomic research have expanded the scale of non-European GWAS, although most of them remain under-powered. Here we present a novel PRS construction method, PRS-CSx, which improves cross-population polygenic prediction by integrating GWAS summary statistics from multiple populations. PRS-CSx couples genetic effects across populations via a shared continuous shrinkage prior, enabling more accurate effect size estimation by sharing information between summary statistics and leveraging linkage disequilibrium (LD) diversity across discovery samples, while inheriting computational efficiency and robustness from PRS-CS. We show that PRS-CSx outperforms alternative methods across traits with a wide range of genetic architectures, cross-population genetic overlaps and discovery GWAS sample sizes in simulations, and improves the prediction of quantitative traits and schizophrenia risk in non-European populations.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 706
- FWCI
- 84.01
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying portable genetic effects and improving cross-ancestry genetic prediction with GWAS summary statistics
Jiacheng Miao, Hanmin Guo, … Qiongshi Lu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 14, 2023
- Polygenic transcriptome risk scores improve portability of polygenic risk scores across ancestries
Yanyu Liang, Milton Pividori, … Hae Kyung Im·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2020
- Polygenic prediction across populations is influenced by ancestry, genetic architecture, and methodology
Ying Wang, Masahiro Kanai, … Alicia R. Martin·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2023
- Inclusion of Variants Discovered from Diverse Populations Improves Polygenic Risk Score Transferability
Taylor B. Cavazos, John S. Witte·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- PRS-GRID: A Cross and Within Ancestry Polygenic Risk Prediction Method Based on Individual Genetic Distance
Liwei Tang, Cong You, … Jie Huang·medRxiv·May 16, 2024
- PRANA: A Deep Learning Method for Adapting Polygenic Risk Scores to Diverse Ethnic Groups
Hagai Levi, Qin Wang, … Kyriaki Michailidou·medRxiv·Jul 15, 2026