henhaobio
Sign in

Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

GAPIT Version 3: Boosting Power and Accuracy for Genomic Association and Prediction

Jiabo WangiD, Zhiwu ZhangiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) and Genomic Prediction/Selection (GP/GS) are the two essential enterprises in genomic research. Due to the great magnitude and complexity of genomic data, analytical methods and their associated software packages are frequently advanced. GAPIT is a widely used Genomic Association and Prediction Integrated Tool. The first version was released to the public in 2012 with the implementation of the general linear model (GLM), mixed linear model (MLM), compressed MLM, and genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (gBLUP). The second version was released in 2016 with several new implementations, including Enriched Compressed MLM and Settlement of mixed linear models Under Progressively Exclusive Relationship (SUPER). All the GWAS methods are based on the single locus test. For the first time, in the current release of GAPIT, version 3 implemented three multiple loci test methods, including Multiple Loci Mixed Model (MLMM), Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification (FarmCPU), and Bayesian-information and Linkage-disequilibrium Iteratively Nested Keyway (BLINK). Additionally, two GP/GS methods were implemented based on Compressed MLM, named compressed BLUP, and SUPER, named SUPER BLUP. These new implementations not only boost statistical power for GWAS and prediction accuracy for GP/GS, but also improve computing speed and increase the capacity to analyze big genomic data. Here, we document the current upgrade of GAPIT by describing the selection of the recently developed methods, their implementation, and potential impact. All documents, including source code, user manual, demo data, and tutorials, are freely available at the GAPIT website (http://zzlab.net/GAPIT).

Citations
1,240
FWCI
92.40
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSlaten '20Wienbrandt '23Zhang '19Fu '26Lam '19Zeng '18
62% semantic matchBioinformatics
Marianne L. Slaten, Yen On Chan, Vivek Shrestha+2 more·Bioinformatics·Jun 16, 2020· 21 citations