Novel regression methods for metacognition
Simon Bang KristenseniD, Kristian SandbergiD, Bo Martin BibbyiD
Abstract
Metacognition is an important component in basic science and clinical psychology, often studied through complex, cognitive experiments. While Signal Detection Theory (SDT) provides a popular and pervasive framework for modelling responses from such experiments, a shortfall remains that it cannot in a straightforward manner account for the often complex designs. Additionally, SDT does not provide direct estimates of metacognitive ability. This latter shortcoming has recently been sought remedied by introduction of a measure for metacognitive sensitivity dubbed meta-d. The need for a flexible regression model framework remains, however, which should also incorporate the new sensitivity measure. In the present paper, we argue that a straightforward extension of SDT is obtained by identifying the model with the proportional odds model, a widely implemented, ordinal regression technique. We go on to develop a formal statistical framework for metacognitive sensitivity by defining a model that combines standard SDT with meta-d in a latent variable model. We show how this agrees with the literature on meta-d and constitutes a practical framework for extending the model. We supply several teoretical considerations on the model, including closed-form approximate estimates of meta-d and optimal weighing of response-specific meta-sensitivities. We discuss regression analysis as an application of the obtained model and illustrate our points through simulations. Lastly, we present R-software that implements the model. Our methods and their implementation extend the computational possibilities of SDT and meta-d and are useful for theoretical and practical researchers of metacognition.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- HMeta-d: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings
S. M. Fleming·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2016
- Reverse engineering of metacognition
Matthias Guggenmos·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2022
- A robust measure of metacognitive sensitivity and confidence criteria
Derek Henry Arnold, Mitchell Clendinen, … Kielan Yarrow·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2023
- Quantifying metacognitive thresholds using signal-detection theory
Maxine T. Sherman, Anil K. Seth, Adam B. Barrett·bioRxiv·Jul 4, 2018
- On why we lack confidence in signal-detection-based analyses of confidence
Derek Henry Arnold, Alan Johnston, … Kielan Yarrow·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2022
- Computational characterization of metacognitive ability in subjective decision-making
Corey R. Plate, Dhruv Govil, … Silvia López-Guzmán·bioRxiv·May 23, 2025