Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Effects of tDCS Dosage on Working Memory in Healthy Participants
Stevan NikoliniD, Donel M MartiniD, Colleen K A LooiD, Tjeerd W. BoonstraiD
Abstract
BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been found to improve working memory (WM) performance in healthy participants following a single session. However, results are mixed and the overall effect size is small. Interpretation of these results is confounded by heterogeneous study designs, including differences in tDCS dose (current intensity) and sham conditions used.\n\nAimsWe systematically investigated the effect of tDCS dose on working memory using behavioural and neurophysiological outcomes.\n\nMethodsIn a single-blind parallel group design, 100 participants were randomised across five groups to receive 15 minutes of bifrontal tDCS at different current intensities (2mA, 1mA, and three sham tDCS conditions at 0.034mA, 0.016mA, or 0mA). EEG activity was acquired while participants performed a WM task prior to, during, and following tDCS. Response time, accuracy and an event-related EEG component (P3) were evaluated.\n\nResultsWe found no significant differences in response time or performance accuracy between current intensities. The P3 amplitude was significantly lower in the 0mA condition compared to the 0.034mA, 1mA and 2mA tDCS conditions. Changes in WM accuracy were moderately correlated with changes in the P3 amplitude following tDCS compared to baseline levels (r = 0.34).\n\nConclusionsWorking memory was not significantly altered by tDCS, regardless of dose. The P3 amplitude showed that stimulation at 1mA, 2mA and a sham condition (0.034mA) had biological effects, with the largest effect size for 1mA stimulation. These findings indicate higher sensitivity of neurophysiological outcomes to tDCS and suggests that sham stimulation previously considered inactive may alter neuronal function.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 118
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- TDCS modulates working memory maintenance processes in healthy individuals
Stevan Nikolin, Donel M Martin, … Tjeerd W. Boonstra·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2022
- Negative affective traits moderate transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on memory
Marko Živanović, Jovana Bjekić, … Saša R. Filipović·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Oct 29, 2025
- Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: a novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling
Miles Wischnewski, Kathleen E. Mantell, Alexander Opitz·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2021
- The effects of prefrontal tDCS on working memory associate with the magnitude of the individual electric field in the brain
Laís Boralli Razza, Stefanie De Smet, … Marie–Anne Vanderhasselt·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2023
- Expectations May Influence the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sheida Rabipour, Allan D. Wu, … Marco Iacoboni·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2018
- Baseline cognitive abilities shape the effects of tDCS, tACS, and otDCS on object-location memory
Jovana Bjekić, Marko Živanović, … Saša R. Filipović·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2026