medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Integrated Clinical-Genomic Reanalysis Identifies Diagnostic Gaps and Candidate Genes in a Pediatric Rare Disease Cohort
Hyunjung GuiD, Aniko SaboiD, Sharayu V. JangamiD, H HashimotoiD, Christina Y. MiyakeiD, Bo YuaniD, Charul Gijavanekar, Eric VenneriD, Viktoriya KorchinaiD, Sarah H. ElseaiD, Donna Marie MuznyiD, Elizabeth A. MizerikiD, Blake VuocoloiD, Poyyapakkam R. SrivathsiD, Lisa Forbes Satter, Sebastian OchoaiD, Stephanie R. SisleyiD, Polle B. Mihindou, Oguz KancaiD, Shinya YamamotoiD, Zhandong LiuiD, Michael F. WangleriD, Richard A. GibbsiD, Hugo Jozef BelleniD, Katherine Y. KingiD
Abstract
PurposeChildren with suspected rare genetic disorders often remain undiagnosed after exome, gene panel, or chromosomal microarray testing. We sought to define recurrent missed-diagnosis mechanisms and evaluate an integrated clinical-genomic reanalysis framework. MethodsWe studied 75 participants with rare or striking pediatric-onset phenotypes who remained undiagnosed after prior genetic testing. Trio genome sequencing evaluated SNVs, indels and copy-number variants. RNA sequencing was performed in 63 participants to assess aberrant expression and splicing, with targeted follow-up assays used selectively for prioritized variants. Clinician-genome scientist review integrated longitudinal phenotyping, physician input, and inheritance. Unresolved cases underwent research-level candidate prioritization. ResultsClinically reportable findings were returned in 9, including two with multilocus findings: 5 explained the primary phenotype and 4, while not fully explanatory, were clinically relevant and informing surveillance, management, or family follow-up. Previously missed findings reflected technical limitations, including deep intronic splice-altering variants supported by transcriptome analysis and a genomic deletion, and interpretive limitations related to incomplete phenotype integration or narrowly scoped prior testing. Research-level analysis prioritized six candidate genes, including biallelic ACHE variants with reduced enzymatic activity. ConclusionIntegrated clinical-genomic reanalysis framework identified diagnostic gaps, recovered care-informing findings, and prioritized candidate genes for rare disease discovery.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic Research as a Critical Pathway to Diagnosis for Individuals with Rare Disease
Anne O’Donnell‐Luria, Stephanie P. DiTroia, … Heidi L. Rehm·medRxiv·Sep 20, 2026
- Genomic answers for children: Dynamic analyses of >1000 pediatric rare disease genomes
Ana S.A. Cohen, Emily Farrow, … Tomi Pastinen·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2022
- The Genomic Landscape of Rare Disorders in the Middle East
Maha El Naofal, Sathishkumar Ramaswamy, … Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 26, 2023
- Unique Capabilities of Genome Sequencing for Rare Disease Diagnosis
Monica Hsiung Wojcik, Gabrielle Lemire, … Anne O’Donnell‐Luria·medRxiv·Aug 8, 2023
- Comprehensive reanalysis for CNVs in exome sequencing data from unsolved rare disease cases results in new diagnoses
German M. Demidov, Burcu Yaldiz, … Emanuele Raineri·npj Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2024
- Systematic evaluation of incomplete penetrance in 4,325 rare disease families reveals divergent transcriptional networks in CHD8 pathology
Mugdha Singh, Sarah L. Stenton, … Sanna Gudmundsson·medRxiv·Oct 7, 2026