Sign in
BioinformaticsPLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

cONcat: Computational reconstruction of concatenated fragments from long Oxford Nanopore reads

Alexander J. PetriiD, Mai Thi-Huyen NguyeniD, Anjali RajwariD, Erik BensoniD, Kristoffer SahliniD

Abstract

Synthetic combinatorial DNA libraries are widely used to produce protein variants, optimize binders, and for high throughput studies of protein - DNA interactions. The libraries can be made by researchers or vendors and high-throughput sequencing is used for both quality control and to study the outcome of selection experiments. Oxford nanopore sequencing (ONT) is well suited to this as it allows for long read lengths and can be done rapidly with low-cost instrumentation. However, it suffers from a lower overall read accuracy and an uneven error profile. No current bioinformatics tools are well suited to the challenge of deducing the composition and order of constituent members of combinatorial libraries from ONT reads. We introduce cONcat, an algorithm to identify the makeup of concatenated DNA fragments in a set of ONT sequencing reads from a pool of known fragments. cONcat uses the edit distance-based recursive covering algorithm for finding the best possible matchings between the fragments and the reads. In our experiments on simulated and experimental data, cONcat could accurately detect the correct fragment coverings given the short fragment sizes (< 20bp) and the sequencing errors present in ONT reads. However, we find that the high error rates in the start of ONT reads make it challenging to get confident coverage there, inferring a need for experimental strategies to avoid key sequence information in the start of reads.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
4
FWCI
1.20
Field percentile
top 24%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISChu '16Bonenfant '22Morisse '18Goodwin '15Yang '16Joshi '20
64% semantic matchBioinformatics
Justin Chu, Hamid Mohamadi, René L. Warren+2 more·Bioinformatics·Dec 16, 2016· 43 citations