eLifeNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Variability of visual field maps in human early extrastriate cortex challenges the canonical model of organization of V2 and V3
Fernanda Lenita RibeiroiD, Ashley YorkiD, Elizabeth ZavitziD, Steffen BollmanniD, Marcello G. P. RosaiD, Alexander M. PuckettiD
Abstract
Visual field maps in human early extrastriate areas (V2 and V3) are traditionally thought to form mirror-image representations which surround the primary visual cortex (V1). According to this scheme, V2 and V3 form nearly symmetrical halves with respect to the calcarine sulcus, with the dorsal halves representing lower contralateral quadrants, and the ventral halves representing upper contralateral quadrants. This arrangement is considered to be consistent across individuals, and thus predictable with reasonable accuracy using templates. However, data that deviate from this expected pattern have been observed, but mainly treated as artifactual. Here we systematically investigate individual variability in the visual field maps of human early visual cortex using the 7T Human Connectome Project (HCP) retinotopy dataset. Our results demonstrate substantial and principled inter-individual variability. Visual field representation in the dorsal portions of V2 and V3 was more variable than in their ventral counterparts, including substantial departures from the expected mirror-symmetrical patterns. In addition, left hemisphere retinotopic maps were more variable than those in the right hemisphere. Surprisingly, only one-third of individuals had maps that conformed to the expected pattern in the left hemisphere. Visual field sign analysis further revealed that in many individuals the area conventionally identified as dorsal V3 shows a discontinuity in the mirror-image representation of the retina, associated with a Y-shaped lower vertical representation. Our findings challenge the current view that inter-individual variability in early extrastriate cortex is negligible, and that the dorsal portions of V2 and V3 are roughly mirror images of their ventral counterparts.
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Variability of the Surface Area of the V1, V2, and V3 Maps in a Large Sample of Human Observers
Noah Charles Benson, Jennifer M. D. Yoon, … Jonathan A. Winawer·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2022
- Identification of the ventral occipital visual field maps in the human brain
Jonathan Winawer, Nathan Witthoft·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2016
- A \"twisted\" visual field map in the primate cortex predicted by topographic continuity
Hsin‐Hao Yu, Declan P Rowley, … Elizabeth Zavitz·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2020
- Comparing retinotopic maps of children and adults reveals a late-stage change in how V1 samples the visual field
Marc M. Himmelberg, Ekin Tünçok, … Jonathan A. Winawer·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 21, 2023
- A sinusoidal transform of the visual field in cortical area V2
Madineh Sedigh-Sarvestani, Kuo-Sheng Lee, … David Fitzpatrick·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2020
- Population receptive field and connectivity properties of the early visual cortex in human albinism
Khazar Ahmadi, Anne Herbik, … Michael B. Hoffmann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 15, 2019