Human MutationGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Robust identification of deletions in exome and genome sequence data based on clustering of Mendelian errors
Kathryn B. ManheimeriD, Nihir PateliD, Felix RichteriD, Joshua GorhamiD, Angela C. Tai, Jason G. Homsy, Marko T. BoskovskiiD, Michael G. Parfenov, Elizabeth GoldmuntziD, Wendy K. ChungiD, Martina K. BrueckneriD, Martin Tristani‐FirouziiD, Deepak SrivastavaiD, Jonathan G. SeidmaniD, Christine E. SeidmaniD, Bruce D. GelbiD, Andrew J. SharpiD
Abstract
Multiple tools have been developed to identify copy number variants (CNVs) from whole exome (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) data. Current tools such as XHMM for WES and CNVnator for WGS identify CNVs based on changes in read depth. For WGS, other methods to identify CNVs include utilizing discordant read pairs and split reads and genome-wide local assembly with tools such as Lumpy and SvABA, respectively. Here, we introduce a new method to identify deletion CNVs from WES and WGS trio data based on the clustering of Mendelian errors (MEs). Using our Mendelian Error Method (MEM), we identified 127 deletions (inherited and de novo) in 2,601 WES trios from the Pediatric Cardiac Genomics Consortium, with a validation rate of 88% by digital droplet PCR. MEM identified additional de novo deletions compared to XHMM, and also identified sample switches, DNA contamination, a significant enrichment of 15q11.2 deletions compared to controls and eight cases of uniparental disomy. We applied MEM to WGS data from the Genome In A Bottle Ashkenazi trio and identified deletions with 97% specificity. MEM provides a robust, computationally inexpensive method for identifying deletions, and an orthogonal approach for verifying deletions called by other tools.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Field percentile
- top 47%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Detection of homozygous and hemizygous partial exon deletions by whole-exome sequencing
Benedetta Bigio, Yoann Seeleuthner, … Aurélie Cobat·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2021
- Evaluation of the performance of copy number variant prediction tools for the detection of deletions from whole genome sequencing data
Whitney Whitford, Klaus Lehnert, … Jessie C. Jacobsen·Journal of Biomedical InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2019
- Polishing Copy Number Variant Calls on Exome Sequencing Data via Deep Learning
Furkan Özden, Can Alkan, A. Ercüment Çiçek·bioRxiv·May 9, 2020
- Mendelian inheritance errors in whole genome sequenced trios are enriched in repeats and cluster within copy number losses
Prachi Kothiyal, Wendy S.W. Wong, … John E. Niederhuber·bioRxiv·Dec 28, 2017
- Detection of de novo copy number deletions from targeted sequencing of trios
Jack M. Fu, Elizabeth J. Leslie, … Ingo Ruczinski·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2018
- ExactCN: Predicting Exact Copy Numbers on Whole Exome Sequencing Data
Erfan FarhangKia, Ahmet Arda Ceylan, … A. Ercüment Çiçek·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2025