bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
So you want to be a Super Researcher?
Abstract
Publishing original scientific research is inherent to the work of a researcher. However, the pressure to maintain productivity and scientific impact can lead to research group publishing excessively, negatively affecting the mental health of a researcher. Ph.D. students and early career researchers are particularly susceptible to this pressure due to the inherent vulnerability of their positions. At present, there are no resources that concisely summarise the publication culture of a research group to help the researcher make an informed decision before joining. In this article, we present the Super Researcher app, an R Shiny application(app) with a user-friendly interface. Using text-mining methodology to extract publicly available author data from Scopus, this pilot app has four fundamental functions to provide snapshot information that will help researchers grasp the publication culture of a research group within minutes. The Super Researcher app provides information on: 1) institution data, 2) authors publication, 3) co-author network plots and 4) publication journals. The Super Researcher app is built on R shiny which provides an interactive interface to users. This app utilizes the Big Data framework Apache Spark to mine relevant information from a huge author information database. The authors information is stored and manipulated using both SQL(SQLite) and NoSQL(HBase) databases. Hbase is used for local data storage and manipulation while SQLite feeds data to the R Shiny interface. In this paper, we introduce these functionalities and illustrate how this information can help guide a researcher to select a new Principle Investigator (PI) with better compatibility in terms of publication attitude using a case study. Available: https://researchmind.co.uk/super-researcher/
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Career incentives make Registered Reports unattractive under realistic academic conditions
Anne M. Scheel, Leonid Tiokhin, Daniël Lakens·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- Intellectual contributions meriting authorship:Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories
G. S. Patience, F. Galli, … D. C. Boffito·bioRxiv·May 17, 2018
- Adjutant: an R-based tool to support topic discovery for systematic and literature reviews
Anamaria Crisan, Tamara Munzner, Jennifer L. Gardy·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2018
- Collective AI use is associated with researcher engagement: Real-time evidence from a scientific conference
Hiroyuki Okada, Shigeto Seno, … Naganari Okura·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2026
- Scholar Metrics Scraper (SMS): automated retrieval of citation and author data
N. A. Cheung, D. Giustini, … T. H. Murphy·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2021
- Factors Associated with Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education
L. A. Maggio, T. Dong, … A. Artino·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2018