Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Comparison of Two-Talker Attention Decoding from EEG with Nonlinear Neural Networks and Linear Methods
Gregory A. CiccarelliiD, Michael A. NolaniD, Joseph Perricone, Paul Thomas CalamiaiD, Stephanie HaroiD, James O’SullivaniD, Nima MesgaraniiD, Thomas Francis QuatieriiD, Christopher J. SmaltiD
Abstract
Auditory attention decoding (AAD) through a brain-computer interface has had a flowering of developments since it was first introduced by Mesgarani and Chang (2012) using electrocorticograph recordings. AAD has been pursued for its potential application to hearing-aid design in which an attention-guided algorithm selects, from multiple competing acoustic sources, which should be enhanced for the listener and which should be suppressed. Traditionally, researchers have separated the AAD problem into two stages: reconstruction of a representation of the attended audio from neural signals, followed by determining the similarity between the candidate audio streams and the reconstruction. In this work, we compare the traditional two-stage approach with a novel neural-network architecture that subsumes the explicit similarity step. We compare this new architecture against linear and non-linear (neural-network) baselines using both wet and dry electroencephalogram (EEG) systems. Our results indicate that the wet and dry systems can deliver comparable results despite the latter having one third as many EEG channels as the former, and that the new architecture outperforms the baseline stimulus-reconstruction methods for both EEG modalities. The 14-subject, wet-electrode AAD dataset for two competing, co-located talkers, the 11-subject, dry-electrode AAD dataset, and our software are available to download for further validation, experimentation, and modification.
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- approach: deep learning
- Citations
- 133
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Time-adaptive Unsupervised Auditory Attention Decoding Using EEG-based Stimulus Reconstruction
Simon Geirnaert, Tom Francart, Alexander Bertrand·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2022
- Auditory attention detection with EEG channel attention
Enze Su, Siqi Cai, … Haizhou Li·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2021
- EEG-based Decoding of Auditory Attention to Conversations with Turn-taking Speakers
Iris Van de Ryck, Nicolas Heintz, … Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2026
- A Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Auditory Attention in Multi-Talker Environments
Stephanie Haro, Christine Beauchene, … Christopher J. Smalt·IEEE AccessPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Linear versus deep learning methods for noisy speech separation for EEG-informed attention decoding
N. Das, J. Zegers, … A. Bertrand·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2020
- Real-time control of a hearing instrument with EEG-based attention decoding
Jens Hjortkjær, Daniel D.E. Wong, … Alain De Cheveigné A·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2025