Journal of Neural EngineeringNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
What are we really decoding? Unveiling biases in EEG-based decoding of the spatial focus of auditory attention
Iustina RotaruiD, Simon GeirnaertiD, Nicolas HeintziD, Iris Van de RyckiD, Alexander BertrandiD, Tom FrancartiD
Abstract
ObjectiveSpatial auditory attention decoding (Sp-AAD) refers to the task of identifying the direction of the speaker to which a person is attending in a multi-talker setting, based on the listeners neural recordings, e.g., electroencephalography (EEG). The goal of this study is to thoroughly investigate potential biases when training such Sp-AAD decoders on EEG data, particularly eye-gaze biases and latent trial-dependent confounds, which may result in Sp-AAD models that decode eye-gaze or trial-specific fingerprints rather than spatial auditory attention. ApproachWe designed a two-speaker audiovisual Sp-AAD protocol in which the spatial auditory and visual attention were enforced to be either congruent or incongruent, and we recorded EEG data from sixteen participants undergoing several trials recorded at distinct timepoints. We trained a simple linear model for Sp-AAD based on common spatial patterns (CSP) filters in combination with either linear discriminant analysis (LDA) or k-means clustering, and evaluated them both across- and within-trial. Main resultsWe found that even a simple linear Sp-AAD model is susceptible to overfitting to confounding signal patterns such as eye-gaze and trial fingerprints (e.g., due to feature shifts across trials), resulting in artificially high decoding accuracies. Furthermore, we found that changes in the EEG signal statistics across trials deteriorate the trial generalization of the classifier, even when the latter is retrained on the test trial with an unsupervised algorithm. SignificanceCollectively, our findings confirm that there exist subtle biases and confounds that can strongly interfere with the decoding of spatial auditory attention from EEG. It is expected that more complicated non-linear models based on deep neural networks, which are often used for Sp-AAD, are even more vulnerable to such biases. Future work should perform experiments and model evaluations that avoid and/or control for such biases in Sp-AAD tasks.
- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 10.42
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions
Ali Aroudi, Bojana Mirkovic, … Simon Doclo·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2019
- EEG-based Decoding of Auditory Attention to Conversations with Turn-taking Speakers
Iris Van de Ryck, Nicolas Heintz, … Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2026
- Fast EEG-based decoding of the directional focus of auditory attention using common spatial patterns
Simon Geirnaert, Tom Francart, Alexander Bertrand·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2020
- A Neuroscience-Inspired Spiking Neural Network for Auditory Spatial Attention Detection Using Single-Trial EEG
Faramarz Faghihi, Siqi Cai, Ahmed A. Moustafa·bioRxiv·May 25, 2021
- Time-adaptive Unsupervised Auditory Attention Decoding Using EEG-based Stimulus Reconstruction
Simon Geirnaert, Tom Francart, Alexander Bertrand·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2022
- Speaker Identity is Robustly Encoded in Spatial Patterns of Intracranial EEG for Attention Decoding
Sukru Samet Dindar, Xilin Jiang, … Nima Mesgarani·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2025