Soil Biology and BiochemistryMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
A comparison among EL-FAME, PLFA, and quantitative PCR methods to detect changes in the abundance of soil bacteria and fungi
José A. SilesiD, Roberto Gómez-Pérez, Alfonso VeraiD, Carlos J. GarcíaiD, Felipe BastidaiD
Abstract
EL-FAME (ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester), PLFA (phospholipid fatty acid) and qPCR (quantitative PCR) of ribosomal genes are three of the most common methods used to quantify soil microbial communities. The reliability of these three methods has not been simultaneously compared in situations of rapid changes in soil microbial abundances. For this purpose, we (i) incubated badland, cropland, and forest soils with nutrients or antibiotics for 2, 7, 14, and 28 days, (ii) quantified total, bacterial, and fungal abundances through EL-FAME, PLFA, and qPCR methods, and (iii) measured soil basal respiration. The general dynamic patterns of the three soil microbial fractions in response to soil addition of nutrients and antibiotics were captured by the three methods, which led to strong and positive associations between the abundances of total microorganisms, bacteria, and fungi measured by the three techniques. However, these relationships were found to be stronger between the EL-FAME and PLFA results, indicating that reliability of the fatty-acid based methods is higher than that of the qPCR. Further, soil basal respiration was associated to a higher extent with total, bacterial, and fungal abundances captured by EL-FAME and PLFA analyses than with those measured by qPCR, which suggests that the first two methods are most closely related to the soil living microbial community. In general, dynamics in the abundance of total and bacterial communities were better captured than those of fungi. The PLFA analysis seems to perform better than the EL-FAME method in forest soil and in detecting the small antibiotic-induced decreases in microbial abundances. Since the EL-FAME method is cheaper and allows a much faster processing of samples than the PLFA method, and the reliability of both methods is similar in detecting rapid changes of soil microbial abundances, choosing EL-FAME over PLFA may be advantageous in most cases.
- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Core and indicative bacterial and fungal taxa define characteristic soil communities of arable land, grassland, and forest
F. Gschwend, M. Hartmann, … F. Widmer·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2021
- Revisiting soil fungal biomarkers and conversion factors: Interspecific variability in phospholipid fatty acids, ergosterol and rDNA copy numbers
T. Camenzind, H. Haslwimmer, … S. Marhan·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2024
- Pasture age impacts soil fungal composition while bacteria respond to soil chemistry
F. M. Seaton, R. I. Griffiths, … L. R. Norton·bioRxiv·Sep 13, 2021
- Seasonal Change of Microbial Diversity and Its Relation with Soil Chemical Properties in Orchard
X. Luo, M. Wang, … B. Weng·PLOS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2019
- Relative and quantitative rhizosphere microbiome profiling result in distinct abundance patterns
H. Azarbad, J. Tremblay, … E. Yergeau·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2021
- Microbial dormancy improves predictability of soil respiration at the seasonal time scale
A. Salazar, J. T. Lennon, J. S. Dukes·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2018