PLoS BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Training qualitatively shifts the neural mechanisms that support attentional selection
Sirawaj ItthipuripatiD, Kexin Cha, Anna Byers, John T. SerencesiD
Abstract
Attention supports the selection of relevant sensory information from competing irrelevant sensory information. This selective processing is thought to be supported via the attentional gain amplification of sensory responses evoked by attended compared to unattended stimuli. However, recent studies in highly trained subjects suggest that attentional gain plays a relatively modest role and that other types of neural modulations - such as a reduction in neural noise - better explain attention-related changes in behavior. We hypothesized that the amount of training may alter neural mechanisms that support attentional selection in visual cortex. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the influence of training on attentional modulations of stimulus-evoked visual responses by recording electroencephalography (EEG) from humans performing a selective visuospatial attention task over the course of one month. Early in training, visuospatial attention induced a robust attentional gain amplification of sensory-evoked responses in contralateral visual cortex that emerged within ~100ms after stimulus onset, and a quantitative model based on signal detection theory (SDT) successfully linked this attentional gain amplification to attention-related improvements in behavior. However, after training, this attentional gain amplification of visual responses was almost completely eliminated and modeling suggested that noise reduction was required to link the amplitude of visual responses with attentional modulations of behavior. These findings suggest that the neural mechanisms supporting selective attention can change as a function of training and expertise, and help to bridge different results from studies carried out in different model systems that require substantially different amount of training.
- Citations
- 44
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Gain, not concomitant changes in spatial receptive field properties, improves task performance in a neural network attention model
Kai J Fox, Daniel Birman, Justin L. Gardner·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 15, 2023
- Learning and attention increase visual response selectivity through distinct mechanisms
Jasper Poort, Katharina Anna Wilmes, … Adil Ghani Khan·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2021
- Simultaneous multi-area recordings suggest that attention improves performance by reshaping stimulus representations
Douglas A. Ruff, Marlene R. Cohen·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2019
- Attentional modulation of neural phase is enhanced by short-term training and linked to musical experience
Aeron Laffere, Frederic Dick, Adam Taylor Tierney·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2019
- Task-related modulation of event-related potentials does not reflect changes to sensory representations
Reuben Rideaux·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Separable codes for read-out of mouse primary visual cortex across attentional states
Ashley M. Wilson, Jeffrey M. Beck, Lindsey L. Glickfeld·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2019