PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Investigating speech and language impairments in delirium: a preliminary case-control study
Samantha GreeniD, Satu Reivonen, Lisa-Marie Rutter, Eva Nouzová, Nikki Duncan, Caoimhe Clarke, Alasdair M. J. MacLullichiD, Zoë TiegesiD
Abstract
Introduction\n\nLanguage impairment is recognized as a diagnostic feature of delirium, yet there is little neuropsychological research on the nature of this dysfunction. Here we hypothesized that patients with delirium show impairments in language formation, coherence and comprehension.\n\nMethods\n\nThis was a case-control study in 45 hospitalized patients (aged 65-97 years) with delirium, dementia without delirium, or no cognitive impairment (N=15 per group). DSM-5 criteria were used for delirium. Speech was elicited during (1) structured conversational questioning, and (2) the \"Cookie Theft\" picture description task. Language comprehension was assessed through standardized verbal and written commands. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed.\n\nResults\n\nDelirium and dementia groups scored lower on the conversational assessment than the control group (p<0.01, moderate effect sizes (r) of 0.48 and 0.51, resp.). In the Cookie Theft task, the average length of utterances (i.e. unit of speech), indicating language productivity and fluency, distinguished patients with delirium from those with dementia (p<0.01, r=0.50) and no cognitive impairment (p<0.01, r=0.55). Patients with delirium performed worse on written comprehension tests compared to cognitively unimpaired patients (p<0.01, r=0.63), but not compared to the dementia group.\n\nConclusions\n\nProduction of spontaneous speech, word quantity, speech content and verbal and written language comprehension are impaired in delirious patients compared to cognitively unimpaired patients. Additionally, patients with delirium produced significantly less fluent speech than those with dementia. These findings have implications for how speech and language are evaluated in delirium assessments, and also for communication with patients with delirium.
- Citations
- 27
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkersdepends on degree of talker familiarity
Jens Kreitewolf, Malte Wöstmann, … Jonas Obleser·Attention Perception & PsychophysicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2019
- The language of mental images: Characterizing hippocampal contributions to imageable word use during event construction
Elizabeth Race, Camille Carlisle, … Mieke H. Verfaellie·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Dec 7, 2020
- Auditory biases in cognitive assessment: Insights from hearing-loss simulation for dementia screening
Christian Füllgrabe·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2022
- Mapping language and non-language cognitive deficits in post-stroke anomic aphasia
Haya Akkad, Thomas M.H. Hope, … Jenny Crinion·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2021
- Common neural responses to narrative speech indisorders of consciousness
Ivan Iotzov, Brian C. Fidali, … Lucas C. Parra·Annals of Clinical and Translational NeurologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2017
- Aberrant perceptual judgements on speech-relevant acoustic features in hallucination-prone individuals
Julia Erb, Jens Kreitewolf, … Jonas Obleser·Schizophrenia Bulletin OpenPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020