Heterogeneity in Neuronal Dynamics is Learned by Gradient Descent for Temporal Processing Tasks
Chloe N. WinstoniD, Dana MastrovitoiD, Eric Shea‐BrowniD, Ştefan MihalaşiD
Abstract
Individual neurons in the brain have complex intrinsic dynamics that are highly diverse. We hypothesize that the complex dynamics produced by networks of complex and heterogeneous neurons may contribute to the brains ability to process and respond to temporally complex data. To study the role of complex and heterogeneous neuronal dynamics in network computation, we develop a rate-based neuronal model, the generalized-leaky-integrate-and-firing-rate (GLIFR) model, which is a rate-equivalent of the generalized-leaky-integrate-and-fire model. The GLIFR model has multiple dynamical mechanisms which add to the complexity of its activity while maintaining differentiability. We focus on the role of after-spike currents, currents induced or modulated by neuronal spikes, in producing rich temporal dynamics. We use machine learning techniques to learn both synaptic weights and parameters underlying intrinsic dynamics to solve temporal tasks. The GLIFR model allows us to use standard gradient descent techniques rather than surrogate gradient descent, which has been utilized in spiking neural networks. After establishing the ability to optimize parameters using gradient descent in single neurons, we ask how networks of GLIFR neurons learn and perform on temporally challenging tasks, such as sinusoidal pattern generation and sequential MNIST. We find that these networks learn a diversity of parameters, which gives rise to diversity in neuronal dynamics. We also observe that training networks on the sequential MNIST task leads to formation of cell classes based on the clustering of neuronal parameters. GLIFR networks have mixed performance when compared to vanilla recurrent neural networks but appear to be more robust to random silencing. When we explore these performance gains further, we find that both the ability to learn heterogeneity and the presence of after-spike currents contribute. Our work both demonstrates the computational robustness of neuronal complexity and diversity in networks and demonstrates a feasible method of training such models using exact gradients.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Field percentile
- top 23%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Learning recurrent dynamics in spiking networks
Christopher M. Kim, Carson C. Chow·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2018
- Spontaneous activity emerging from an inferred network model captures complex spatio-temporal dynamics of spiking data
Cristiano Capone, Guido Gigante, Paolo Del Giudice·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2018
- Neural heterogeneity promotes robust learning
Nicolas Perez-Nieves, Vincent C. H. Leung, … Dan F. M. Goodman·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2021
- Learning to learn online with neuromodulated synaptic plasticity in spiking neural networks
Samuel Schmidgall, Joe Hays·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2022
- Complex dynamics in simplified neuronal models: reproducing Golgi cell electroresponsiveness
Alice Geminiani, Claudia Casellato, … Egidio Ugo D'Angelo·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2018
- Versatile Learning without Synaptic Plasticity in a Spiking Neural Network
K. O. Mason, Navid Akbari, … Wilten Nicola·bioRxiv·Jan 2, 2026