bioRxivBioengineering
The effect of constraining mediolateral ankle moments and foot placement on the use of the counter-rotation mechanism during walking
M. van den Bogaart, S. M. Bruijn, J. Spildooren, J. H. van Dieën, P. Meyns
Abstract
Stability during walking can be maintained by shifts of the Center of Pressure through modulation of foot placement and ankle moments (CoP-mechanism). An additional mechanism to stabilize gait, is the counter-rotation mechanism i.e. changing the angular momentum of segments around the Center of Mass (CoM) to change the direction of the ground reaction force. It is unknown if and how humans use the counter-rotation mechanism to control the CoM during walking and how this interacts with the CoP-mechanism. Thirteen healthy adults walked on a treadmill, while full-body kinematic and force plate data were obtained. The contributions of the CoP and the counter-rotation mechanisms to control the CoM were calculated during steady-state walking, walking on LesSchuh, i.e. constraining mediolateral CoP shifts underneath the stance foot and walking on LesSchuh at 50% of normal step width, constraining both foot placement and ankle mechanisms (LesSchuh50%). A decreased magnitude of within-stride control by the CoP-mechanism was compensated for by an increased magnitude of within-stride control by the counter-rotation mechanism during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. This suggests that the counter-rotation mechanism is used to stabilize gait when needed. However, the mean contribution of the counter-rotation mechanism over strides did not increase during LesSchuh50% compared to steady-state walking. The CoP-mechanism was the main contributor to the total CoM acceleration. The use of the counter-rotation mechanism may be limited because angular accelerations ultimately need to be reversed and because of interference with other task constraints, such as head stabilization and preventing interference with the gait pattern.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effect of anteroposterior perturbations on the control of the center of mass during treadmill walking
M. van den Bogaart, J. van Dieen, … P. Meyns·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2019
- Limited effects of age on the use of the ankle and counter-rotation mechanism in the sagittal plane
M. van den Bogaart, S. M. Bruijn, … P. Meyns·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2022
- Ankle muscles drive mediolateral center of pressure control to ensure stable steady state gait
A. M. van Leeuwen, Jaap H. van Dieën, … Sjoerd M. Bruijn·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2021
- The effect of external lateral stabilization on ankle moment control during steady-state walking
A. M. van Leeuwen, J. H. van Dieen, S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2022
- Active foot placement control ensures stable gait: Effect of constraints on foot placement and ankle moments
A.M. van Leeuwen, Jaap H. van Dieën, … Sjoerd M. Bruijn·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2020
- Does ankle push-off correct for errors in anterior-posterior foot placement relative to center-of-mass states?
J. Jin, J. H. van Dieen, … S. M. Bruijn·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2022