Connectome architecture favours within-module diffusion and between-module routing

Abstract

Connectomes are the structural scaffold for signalling within nervous systems. While many network models have been proposed to describe connectome communication, current approaches assume that every pair of neural elements communicates according to the same principle. Connectomes, however, are heterogeneous networks, comprising elements with varied topological and neurobiological makeups. In this paper, we investigate how connectome architecture may facilitate different signalling regimes depending on the topological embedding of communicating neural elements. Specifically, we test the hypothesis that the modular structure of brain networks fosters a dual mode of communication balancing diffusion--passive signal broadcasting--and routing--selective transmission via efficient paths. To this end, we introduce the relative diffusion score (RDS), a measure to quantify the proportional capacity for network communication via diffusion versus routing. We examined the interplay between RDS and connectome architecture in 6 organisms spanning a wide range of spatial resolutions and connectivity mapping techniques--from the complete nervous system of the larval fly to the inter-areal human connectome. Our analyses establish multiple lines of evidence suggesting that connectomes may be universally organised to support within-module diffusion and between-module routing. Using a series of rewiring null models, we untangle the contributions of connectome topology and geometry to the relationship between routing, diffusion and modular architecture. In conclusion, our work puts forth a hybrid conceptualisation of neural communication, in which diffusion contributes to functional segregation by concentrating information within localised clusters, while specialised signal routes enable fast, long-range and cross-system functional integration.