Journal of NeurophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Examining motor evidence for the pause-then-cancel model of action-stopping: Insights from motor system physiology
Joshua R. TatziD, M. Carlson, Carson LovigiD, Jan R. WesseliD
Abstract
Stopping initiated actions is fundamental to adaptive behavior. Longstanding, single-process accounts of action-stopping have been challenged by recent, two-process, pause-then-cancel models. These models propose that action-stopping involves two inhibitory processes: 1) a fast Pause process, which broadly suppresses the motor system as the result of detecting any salient event, and 2) a slower Cancel process, which involves motor suppression specific to the cancelled action. A purported signature of the Pause process is global suppression, or the reduced corticospinal excitability (CSE) of task-unrelated effectors early on in action-stopping. However, unlike the Pause process, few (if any) motor system signatures of a Cancel process have been identified. Here, we used single- and paired-pulse TMS methods to comprehensively measure the local physiological excitation and inhibition of both responding and task-unrelated motor effector systems during action-stopping. Specifically, we measured CSE, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP). Consistent with key predictions from the pause-then-cancel model, CSE measurements at the responding effector indicated that additional suppression was necessary to counteract Go-related increases in CSE during-action-stopping, particularly at later timepoints. Increases in SICI on Stop-signal trials did not differ across responding and non-responding effectors, or across timepoints. This suggests SICI as a potential source of global suppression. Increases in CSP duration on Stop- signal trials were more prominent at later timepoints. SICI and CSP duration therefore appeared most consistent with the Pause and Cancel processes, respectively. Our study provides further evidence from motor system physiology that multiple inhibitory processes influence action-stopping.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Global motor system suppression as the primary mechanism of human action stopping: challenging the pause-then-cancel model
Eashan Ray Chaudhuri, Tiombe Long, Ricci Hannah·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2025
- When Stopping Requires Going; Physiological Similarities Between Action Cancellation and the Cancellation of Action Cancellation
Simon Weber, Sauro E. Salomoni, Mark R. Hinder·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- An exploration of complex action stopping across multiple datasets: Insights into the mechanisms of action cancellation and re-programming
Sauro E. Salomoni, Simon Weber, Mark R. Hinder·CortexPeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2025
- The Contextual Specificity of Pausing: Interpreting Electromyographic Partial Responses During Action Cancellation and Attentional Capture
Simon Weber, Keegan Haugh, … Mark R. Hinder·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2026
- Cortical contributions to attentional orienting and response cancellation in action stopping
Sarah Anne Kemp, Sauro E. Salomoni, … Mark R. Hinder·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Towards a two-stage model of action-stopping: Attentional capture explains motor inhibition during early stop-signal processing
Joshua R. Tatz, Cheol Soh, Jan R. Wessel·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2021