bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses
Abstract
Email is the primary means of communication for scientists. However, scientific authors change email address over time. Using a new method, we have calculated that approximately 18% of all authors contact email addresses in MEDLINE are invalid. While an unfortunate number, it is, however, lower than previously estimated. To mitigate this problem, institutions should provide email forwarding and scientific authors should use more stable email addresses. In fact, a steadily growing share already use free private email addresses: 32% of all new addresses in MEDLINE in 2018 were of this kind.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators including retraction data
John P. A. Ioannidis, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, … Jeroen Baas·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2024
- Concern noted: A descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central.
M. Vaught, D. C. Jordan, H. Bastian·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2017
- Are female scientists underrepresented in self-correcting science for honest error?
M. D. Ribeiro, J. Mena-Chalco, … S. M. Vasconcelos·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2022
- An exploratory analysis of 4844 withdrawn articles and their retraction notes.
C. S. Toma, L. Padureanu·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2021
- Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre-post study.
C. Candal-Pedreira, A. Ruano-Ravina, … M. Perez-Rios·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2020
- Gender imbalances of retraction prevalence among highly cited authors and among all authors
Stefania Boccia, Antonio Cristiano, … John P. A. Ioannidis·Research Integrity and Peer ReviewPeer-reviewed·Sep 30, 2026