henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivScientific Communication & Education

Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses

R. Rodriguez-Esteban, D. Vishnyakova, F. Rinaldi

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Email is the primary means of communication for scientists. However, scientific authors change email address over time. Using a new method, we have calculated that approximately 18% of all authors contact email addresses in MEDLINE are invalid. While an unfortunate number, it is, however, lower than previously estimated. To mitigate this problem, institutions should provide email forwarding and scientific authors should use more stable email addresses. In fact, a steadily growing share already use free private email addresses: 32% of all new addresses in MEDLINE in 2018 were of this kind.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISIoannidis '24Vaught '17Ribeiro '22Toma '21Candal-Pedr '20Boccia '26
57% semantic matchScientific Communication & Education
John P. A. Ioannidis, Angelo Maria Pezzullo, Antonio Cristiano+2 more·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2024· 30 citations