NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Common but different: An ERP study of single- and multi-source interference processing in MSIT
Katarzyna PaluchiD, Ingrida AntonovaiD, Jan NikadoniD, Patrycja DzianokiD, Katarzyna JurewicziD, Jakub WojciechowskiiD, Ewa KublikiD
Abstract
Flexible behavior often requires processing of complex, interfering information. Research has investigated conflict-related brain processes mostly using single tasks which hindered direct comparison of different interference types. Thus, the question if they are resolved by a common mechanism or by a set of different, task-specific mechanisms remains open. In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the spatio-temporal dynamics of cognitive control across Simon, flanker, multi-source and no-conflict conditions. Our findings reveal that all trial types engaged the same sequence of processing stages, as indicated by common ERP waveforms and consistent number and order of microstates across conditions. However, the intensity and duration of these common stages scaled with difficulty of the conflict task (as measured by RTs and accuracy) from Simon to flanker to multi-source interference. Flanker conflict uniquely influenced early ERP components strongly engaging the dorsal attentional system and visual areas, likely due to demands posed by the presence of flanker distractors. Later ERP components (with sources including ventral attention and somatomotor network areas) were affected by both conflicts. Accordingly, when flanker and Simon conflicts were presented together, early processes lineary summed up, but there was an interaction at the later stage of processing paralleling nonlinear drop of accuracy in a multi-conflict condition. Our study provides novel insights into the neural dynamics underlying cognitive control engaged across different conflict types and their interaction. The use of source analysis allowed us to ground ERP-based findings in the wider context of studies, including those using neuroimaging techniques. Highlights- The same processing stages, in same order are evoked in control and conflict trials - Their intensity/duration scale with conflict behavioral difficulty - Flanker conflict demands enhanced early attentional (DAN) and visual processing - Flanker and Simon interact at the late-stage processing involving VAN and SM networks - Flanker and Simon interaction is sublinear
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time-on-task effects
Jakub Wojciechowski, Katarzyna Jurewicz, … Ewa Kublik·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- When conflict cannot be avoided: executive control dominates early selective sensory modulations during cognitive conflict
Sirawaj Itthipuripat, Sean Deering, John T. Serences·bioRxiv·Aug 17, 2017
- Multivariate pattern analysis techniques for electroencephalography data to study interference effects
David López-García, Alberto Sobrado, … Marı́a Ruz·International Journal of Neural SystemsPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- Tracking dynamic adjustments to decision making and performance monitoring processes in conflict tasks
Daniel Feuerriegel, Matthew Jiwa, … Stefan Bode·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2021
- Top-down feature-based cueing modulates conflict-specific ERP components in a Stroop-like task with equiprobable conditions
Daniela Galashan, Julia Siemann, Manfred Herrmann·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2019
- Task-specific neural processes underlying conflict resolution during cognitive control
Yuchen Xiao, Chien‐Chen Chou, … Gabriel Kreiman·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2022