Large-scale comparative analysis reveals top graph signal processing features for subject identification
Thomas A. W. BoltoniD, Mikkel SchöttneriD, Jagruti H. PateliD, Hugo Fluhr, Yasser Alemán‐GómeziD, Patric HagmanniD
Abstract
In magnetic resonance imaging, graph signal processing (GSP) is an analytical framework that enables to express regional functional activity time courses in terms of the underlying structural connectivity backbone. To this end, several parameters must be set during the processing of structural and functional data, and a variety of output features have been proposed. While emerging applications of the GSP framework have shown clear merits to reveal the neural underpinnings of brain disorders, behavioural facets or individuality, at present, the optimal parameter choices and feature types for an outcome of interest remain unknown. Here, we fill this gap by conducting a large-scale comparative analysis across parameter choices and candidate feature types. First, we show that all the studied factors of variation within the GSP pipeline significantly modulate feature vector patterns and feature coefficient values, evidencing the importance of an exhaustive characterization. Second, focusing on the ability to fingerprint individual subjects, we demonstrate that power spectral density and the structural decoupling index are the most all-around feature types, which harmoniously balance robustness to external sources of variation (head movement and acquisition settings), parsimony of the telling feature set, and generalization to altered parcellation specificities. Our results emphasize the importance, for future GSP studies, of carefully considering the undertaken structural connectivity and functional parameter choices as a function of the outcome measure of interest. More globally, they also highlight the relevance of large-scale comparative strategies in optimizing an analytical pipeline towards a specific goal. Our reported methodology can seamlessly be extended to other analytical approaches and outcome measures of interest, which we hope will be of use for future researchers in and outside the GSP subfield. Key pointsO_LIGraph signal processing (GSP) analysis involves many parameters to select and can yield diverse types of features. C_LIO_LIAll investigated parameters significantly modulated feature vector patterns and values. C_LIO_LIPower spectral density and structural decoupling index are recommended for fingerprinting overall. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain structure-function coupling provides signatures for task decoding and individual fingerprinting
Alessandra Griffa, Enrico Amico, … Maria Giulia Preti·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2022
- Brain fingerprinting using fMRI spectral signatures on high-resolution cortical graphs
Carlo Ferritto, Maria Giulia Preti, … Hamid Behjat·IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW)Peer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2023
- Brain fingerprinting using EEG graph inference
Maliheh Miri, Vahid Abootalebi, … Hamid Behjat·European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)Peer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2023
- Global Signal Removal (GSR) as graph spatial filtering
Fahimeh Arab, Benjamin Snow Sipes, … Ashish Raj·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2026
- Rest-fMRI Based Comparison Study between Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typically Control Using Graph Frequency Bands
A. T. Jafadideh, B. Mohammadzadeh Asl·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2021
- Voxel-Wise Brain Graphs from Diffusion MRI: Intrinsic Eigenspace Dimensionality and Application to Functional MRI
Hamid Behjat, Anjali Tarun, … Dimitri Van De Ville·IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2023