Global Change BiologyEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Mixed evidence for species diversity affecting ecological forecasts in constant versus declining light
Romana LimbergeriD, Uriah DaugaardiD, Yves Choffat, Anubhav GuptaiD, Martina JelićiD, Sabina Jyrkinen, Rainer M. KrugiD, Seraina Nohl, Frank PennekampiD, Sofia J. van MoorseliD, Xue Zheng, Debra Zuppinger‐DingleyiD, Owen L. PetcheyiD
Abstract
Accurate forecasts of ecological dynamics are critical for ecosystem management and conservation, yet the drivers of forecastability are poorly understood. Environmental change and diversity are considered major challenges to ecological forecasting. This assumption, however, has never been tested experimentally because forecasts have high data requirements. In a long-term microcosm experiment, we manipulated species richness of 30 experimental protist communities and exposed them to constant or gradually decreasing light levels. We collected finely-resolved time series (123 sampling dates over 41 weeks) of species abundances, community biomass, and oxygen concentrations. We then employed data-driven forecasting methods to forecast these variables. We found that species richness and light had a weak interactive effect on forecasts of species abundances: richness tended to reduce forecast accuracy in constant light but tended to increase forecast accuracy in declining light. These effects could partially be explained by differences among time series in variability and autocorrelation. Forecasts of aggregate properties (community biomass, oxygen), however, were unaffected by richness and light, and were not more accurate than those of species abundances. Our forecasts were based on time series that were detrended and standardized. Since real-world forecasting applications require predictions at the original scale of the forecasted variable, it is important to note that the results were qualitatively identical when back-transforming the forecasts to the original scale. Taken together, we found no strong evidence that higher diversity results in lower forecastability. Rather, our results imply that promoting diversity could make populations more predictable when environmental conditions change. From a conservation and management perspective, our findings suggest that diversity conservation might have beneficial effects on decision-taking by increasing the forecastability of species abundances in changing environments.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 42%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Predictability Framework for Conservation Strategy: Empirical Evidence from Estuarine Biodiversity Forecasting
Masami Fujiwara·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2026
- Biodiversity forecasting in natural plankton communities reveals temperature and biotic interactions as key predictors
Ewa Merz, Francesco Pomati, … Luis J. Gilarranz·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2025
- Forecasts for 80% of wild populations and communities predict no change, and why
Claudio Bozzuto, Anthony R. Ives·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2025
- The Ecological Forecast Horizon, and examples of its uses and determinants
Owen L Petchey, Mikael Pontarp, … Ian S Pearse·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2015
- Assessing predictive accuracy of species abundance models in dynamic systems
Christopher James Brown, Christina A. Buelow, … Elizabeth S. Oh·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2025
- Predictability of ecological and evolutionary dynamics in a changing world
C. Bozzuto, A. R. Ives·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2023