henhaobio
Sign in

Abstract

BackgroundSmall nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are RNA components of the major and minor spliceosomes that play a core role in splice-site recognition and control of the splicing process. Variants in genes that produce snRNAs are increasingly recognised as major contributors to rare disorders, including neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) and retinal dystrophies (collectively termed RNUopathies, a subset of spliceosomopathies). Clinical interpretation of variants in snRNAs is, however, challenging and existing guidance to support clinical variant classification does not adequately capture the unique features of snRNAs that necessitate a bespoke approach. MethodsWe quantified the elevated background mutation rate in snRNA genes using de novo variants from 12,007 trios and assessed mutation density in 76,215 genome sequenced individuals in gnomAD. We convened a panel of clinical, research, and industry scientists with wide-ranging expertise in clinical variant interpretation and classification and expert knowledge in snRNA genes to draft and refine a guidance document. ResultsWe detail important considerations for variant classification in snRNA genes. These include: the difficulties of variant identification which requires genome or targeted sequencing approaches, the large number of gene paralogs with high sequence identity that complicate read mapping and variant calling, and historical inaccuracies in snRNA gene annotation. Further we show a [~]50-fold increase in de novo mutation rate in snRNA genes compared to intergenic sequence and discuss the implications of this for variant classification. We provide a set of specific recommendations for classifying variants in snRNA genes. Finally, we introduce RNUdb, an interactive web-based tool to support snRNA variant annotation and classification. ConclusionsWe provide the first guidance for clinical variant classification in snRNA genes and anticipate that this will support routine screening and analysis of snRNA genes in clinical genetic testing.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISNava '25Messaoud '26Porras '25Chen '24Leitão '26Maurer '25
68% semantic matchGenetic & Genomic Medicine
Caroline Nava, Benjamin Cogné, Amandine Santini+97 more·Nature Genetics·May 16, 2025· 57 citations