bioRxivEcologyPreprint
What unexplored means: Mapping undersampled regions in natural history collections
P. Chakrabarty, L. Ball, S. Rodriguez Machado, D. Paredes-Burneo, S. Rutledge, D. Boyd, D. Vander Pluym, S. Babb-Biernacki, A. Chipps, R. Ozturk, Y. Terzi
Abstract
We examined global records of accessible natural history voucher collections (with publicly available data) for terrestrial and freshwater vascular plants, fungi, freshwater fishes, birds, mammals, and herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles) and highlight areas of the world that would be considered undersampled and sometimes called "unexplored" (i.e., have relatively low, or no evidence of, past sampling efforts) under typical Western-scientific descriptions. We also question what "unexplored" may actually mean in these contexts and explain how retiring the term in favor of more nuanced phrasing can mitigate future misunderstandings of natural history science.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The colonial legacy of herbaria
D. S. Park, X. Feng, … Slette·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2021
- Global and national trends in documenting and monitoring species distributions
R. Y. Oliver, C. Meyer, … W. Jetz·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2020
- Plant diversity darkspots for global collection priorities
I. Ondo, K. Dhanjal-Adams, … A. Antonelli·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2023
- The second life of collection - how the scientific value of natural history holdings can be deliberately increased
Jerzy Błoszyk, Marcin Lawenda·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- Closing Gaps But Increasing Bias In North American Butterfly Inventory Completeness
V. Shirey, M. W. Beltiz, … R. Guralnick·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2020
- Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
M. R. Moura, W. Jetz·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2020