henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivEcologyPreprint

What unexplored means: Mapping undersampled regions in natural history collections

P. Chakrabarty, L. Ball, S. Rodriguez Machado, D. Paredes-Burneo, S. Rutledge, D. Boyd, D. Vander Pluym, S. Babb-Biernacki, A. Chipps, R. Ozturk, Y. Terzi

PDFDOI

Abstract

We examined global records of accessible natural history voucher collections (with publicly available data) for terrestrial and freshwater vascular plants, fungi, freshwater fishes, birds, mammals, and herpetofauna (amphibians and reptiles) and highlight areas of the world that would be considered undersampled and sometimes called "unexplored" (i.e., have relatively low, or no evidence of, past sampling efforts) under typical Western-scientific descriptions. We also question what "unexplored" may actually mean in these contexts and explain how retiring the term in favor of more nuanced phrasing can mitigate future misunderstandings of natural history science.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.