bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Antennal sensilla diversity in diurnal and nocturnal fireflies (Coleoptera, Lampyridae)
Y. Pacheco, E. Mann, L. F. L. Da Silveira, S. M. Bybee, M. A. Branham, J. V. McHugh, K. F. Stanger-Hall
Abstract
Insects use their antennae to collect environmental information. While the structural diversity of insect antennae is immediately obvious, the diversity of the minute antennal sensilla that interact with the environmental stimuli and translate them into sensory input, is largely unknown for many insect groups. This includes the beetle family Lampyridae, which includes nocturnal species that use bioluminescent signals during mate search, and diurnal species that rely exclusively on pheromones to identify and locate a potential mate. Diurnal species tend to have relatively larger antennae, and diurnal males have larger antennae than their females. It is generally assumed that antennal size reflects sensilla numbers, but this remains to be tested. Here we use Scanning Electron Microscopy to document the sensilla diversity of both males and females of three diurnal and four nocturnal firefly species, as well as total sensilla numbers, densities and their distribution along the antenna. We identified 14 sensilla morphotypes across the seven species, including 12 morphotypes that are new for Lampyridae. Mechanosensilla (3 morphotypes) were the most abundant and conserved sensilla across firefly species, and the distribution of chemosensilla (9 morphotypes) was unexpectedly variable across species. We hypothesized that the differences in mating signals between diurnal and nocturnal fireflies would be reflected in their chemosensilla counts or densities. As predicted, diurnal and nocturnal fireflies did not differ in their mechanoreceptor counts or densities, nor did males and females. In contrast, firefly males had significantly more chemoreceptors (and higher densities) than females and the interaction term (activity by sex) was also significant: diurnal males had significantly more chemoreceptors than nocturnal males, highlighting the importance of pheromones for diurnal species. Based on a series of predictions, we also identified a pheromone sensilla candidate for each species that will facilitate functional testing in future studies.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Antennal RNAseq reveals odorant receptors with sex-biased expression in the common eastern firefly, Photinus pyralis
Sarah E. Lower, Samuel Pring, … Robert F. Mitchell·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2025
- Identification of a Female-produced Sex Attractant Pheromone of the Winter Firefly, Photinus corrusca
S. E. Lower, G. M. Pask, … J. G. Millar·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2022
- Female Olfactory Sensitivity is Temporally Asynchronous with Male Courtship in a Butterfly
Matthew J. Murphy, Yi Ting Ter, … Erica L. Westerman·Journal of Experimental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 29, 2025
- Molecular signatures of sexual communication in the phlebotomine sand flies
P. V. Hickner, N. Timoshevskaya, … Z. Syed·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2020
- Distribution of midleg campaniform sensilla in Hemiptera and their association with vibrational communication
Brian D. Saltin, Leonidas‐Romanos Davranoglou·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- How to stand out to a mate - Flash colour of Photinus fireflies maximizes signal contrast against ambient light
Judson Stricklin, Roland Kimsey, … Kathrin F. Stanger‐Hall·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2026