NeuropsychologiaNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
"A mosquito bites and a butterfly flies": a specific response type of frontal patients in a similarity task
Béatrice GarciniD, Emmanuelle Volle CiD, Aurélie Funkiewiez, Bruce L. MilleriD, Bruno DuboisiD, Richard Lévy
Abstract
BackgroundPatients with neurodegenerative diseases affecting the frontal lobes have difficulties in categorization tasks, such as the similarity tasks. They give two types of unusual response to the question: \"In what way are an orange and a banana alike?\", either a differentiation (\"one is yellow, the other is orange\") or a concrete similarity (\"they are sweet\").\n\nObjectiveTo characterize the categorization deficit of frontal patients and develop a short diagnostic tool to assess the nature of these difficulties.\n\nMethodWe analyzed the responses provided by frontal and non-frontal neurodegenerative patients in a novel verbal similarity task (SimiCat). We included 40 frontal patients with behavioral variant fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), 23 patients with Alzheimers disease (AD) and 41 healthy matched controls. Responses that did not correspond to the expected taxonomic category (e.g.: fruits) were considered as errors.\n\nResultsAll patients groups were impaired at the SimiCat test compared to controls. Differentiation errors were specific of frontal patients. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that a cut-off of two differentiation errors or more achieved 85% sensitivity of 100% specificity to discriminate bvFTD from AD. A short version of the test (<5 min) showed similar discriminative validity as the full version.\n\nConclusionDifferentiation responses were specific of frontal patients. The SimiCat demonstrates good discriminative validity to differentiate bvFTD and AD. The short version of the test is a promising diagnostic tool that will need validation in future studies.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multimodal Imaging and Logistic Weighted Cognitive Scores for Classification of MCI, AD, and FTD Subtypes
Sunil Kumar Khokhar, Rohit Misra, … Rose Dawn Bharath·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2025
- Differential effects of neurodegenerative disorders on verbal creative idea generation and its cognitive cornerstones
Melody M.Y. Chan, John D. O’Sullivan, … Gail A. Robinson·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2025
- Single-Case Disconnectome Lesion-symptom Mapping: Identifying Two Subtypes of Limb Apraxia
Rachel Metzgar, Harrison Stoll, … Frank E. Garcea·NeuropsychologiaPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Data-driven algorithm for the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia
Ana Laura Manera, Mahsa Dadar, … GENetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative (GENFI)·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2019
- Graded, multi dimensional intragroup and intergroup variations in primary progressive aphasia and post stroke aphasia.
Ruth U. Ingram, Ajay D. Halai, … Matthew A. Lambon Ralph·bioRxiv·Dec 29, 2019
- A unified neurocognitive model of the anterior temporal lobe contributions to semantics, language, social behaviour & face recognition
Junhua Ding, Keliang Chen, … Matthew A. Lambon Ralph·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2019