bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Multimodal Imaging and Logistic Weighted Cognitive Scores for Classification of MCI, AD, and FTD Subtypes
Sunil Kumar KhokhariD, Rohit Misra, Manoj KumariD, Faheem ArshadiD, Nithin ThanisseryiD, Sandeep KumariD, Tejaswini S. Manae, Subasree RamakrishnaniD, Sandhya MangaloreiD, Suvarna AlladiiD, Tapan Kumar GandhiiD, Rose Dawn BharathiD
Abstract
BackgroundDifferentiating between mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimers disease (AD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes remains a clinical challenge due to overlapping cognitive symptoms, structural atrophy, and metabolic patterns, especially in the early stages. Multimodal classification approaches integrating neuroimaging and cognitive scores may offer early and accurate characterization and subsequently improved diagnostic precision. MethodsIn this study, we included 100 participants (50 AD, 30 FTD, including 14 bvFTD and 16 PPA, and 20 MCI) who underwent simultaneous structural MRI and FDG-PET imaging. Cortical thickness (CTH) from anatomical MRI and standardized uptake values from FDG-PET were extracted using FreeSurfer and PETSurfer pipelines, respectively. CTH and FDG-PET features were combined into a single vector through a logistic weighting function derived from ACE-III scores, capturing the progressive nature of cognitive decline in dementia. A Naive Bayes classifier was then trained to differentiate diagnostic groups based on the merged features. ResultsThe model achieved classification accuracies of 83% for MCI vs. dementia (AD + FTD), 85% for MCI vs. FTD, 87% for MCI vs. PPA, 71% for MCI vs. bvFTD, 64% for MCI vs. AD, and 69% for AD vs. FTD. The overall classification accuracy was 68%, with the highest discriminative performance observed in separating MCI from FTD subtypes. ConclusionsThis study presents a novel, cognition-weighted multimodal approach combining structural and metabolic imaging to enhance the classification of neurodegenerative syndromes. Findings from this study, underscore the potential of integrating ACE-III scores with neuroimaging biomarkers for accurate characterization and, early-stage differentiation of MCI, AD, and FTD variants.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Brain Morphometry and White Matter Connectomes
Yun Wang, Chenxiao Xu, … The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Diagnosis and Prognosis Using Machine Learning Trained on Brain Morphometry and White Matter Connectomes
Yun Wang, Chenxiao Xu, … Jiook Cha·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2018
- Multidomain Analysis of Clinical Cognitive Assessments and Imaging Data in Alzheimer's Disease Accurately Predicts Disease Stage and Grade Independent of Amyloid and Tau
Juan Antonio K. Chong Chie, Scott A. Persohn, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2026
- Subregional Biomarkers in FDG PET for Alzheimer's Diagnosis and Staging: An Interpretable and Explainable model
Ramin Rasi, Albert Güveniş, the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2024
- Identification and Validation of New Molecular Subtypes within the Early and Late Mild Cognitive Impairment Stages of Alzheimer's Disease
Bowei Li, Shashank Yadav, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·medRxiv·Apr 6, 2023
- A comparison of resting state EEG and structural MRI for classifying Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment
Francesca R Farina, Derya Durusu Emek‐Savaş, … Robert Whelan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2020