bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Relative matching using low coverage sequencing
Ella PetteriD, Regev SchweigeriD, Bar Shahino, Tal ShoriD, Malka Aker, Lior Almog, Daphna Weissglas‐VolkoviD, Yoav Naveh, Oron Navon, Shai CarmiiD, Jeremiah H. LiiD, Tomaz Berisa, Joseph K. Pickrell, Yaniv ErlichiD
Abstract
Finding familial relatives using DNA has multiple applications, in genetic genealogy, population genetics, and forensics. So far, most relative matching algorithms rely on detecting identity-by-descent (IBD) segments with high quality genotype data. Recently, low coverage sequencing (LCS) has received growing attention as a promising cost-effective method to ascertain genomic information. However, with higher error rates, it is unclear whether existing IBD detection can work on LCS datasets. Here, we developed and tested a framework for relative matching using sequencing with 1x coverage (1xLCS). We started by exploring the error characteristics of this method compared to array data. Our results show that after some optimization 1xLCS can exhibit the same genotyping discordance rates as the discordance between two array platforms. Using this observation, we developed a hybrid framework for relative matching and tuned this framework with >2,700 pairs of confirmed genealogical relatives that were genotyped using heterogenous datasets. We then obtained array and 1xLCS on 19 samples and use our framework to find relatives in a database of over 3 million individuals. The total length of shared segments obtained by 1xLCS was virtually indistinguishable to genotyping arrays for matches with a total sharing >200cM (second cousins or closer). For more distant relatives, as long as those were detected by both technologies, the total length obtained by LCS and by genotyping arrays was highly correlated, with no evidence of over- or underestimation. Taken together, our results show that 1xLCS can be a valid alternative to arrays for relative matching, opening the possibility for further democratization of genomic data.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Biological Relatedness from Low Coverage Sequencing Data
Mikhail Lipatov, Komal Sanjeev, … Krishna R Veeramah·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2015
- A Novel Efficient Algorithm for Common Variants Genotyping from Low-Coverage Sequencing Data
Shixuan Zhang, Kanglong Xiao, … Yi Wang·Computational and Structural Biotechnology ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Reveel: large-scale population genotyping using low-coverage sequencing data
Lin Huang, Bo Wang, … Serafim Batzoglou·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2015
- Comparing low-pass sequencing and genotyping for trait mapping in pharmacogenetics
Kaja A. Wasik, Tomaz Berisa, … Charles J. Cox·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2021
- Low coverage whole genome sequencing enables accurate assessment of common variants and calculation of genome-wide polygenic scores
Julian R. Homburger, Cynthia L. Neben, … Amit V. Khera·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2019
- Efficient phasing and imputation of low-coverage sequencing data using large reference panels
Simone Rubinacci, Diogo M. Ribeiro, … Olivier Delaneau·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021