henhaobio
Sign in

Behavior Research MethodsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Generating accurate 3D gaze vectors using synchronized eye tracking and motion capture

Scott A. StoneiD, Quinn A. Boser, Todd Dawson, Albert H. VetteiD, Jacqueline S. HebertiD, Patrick M. PilarskiiD, Craig S. ChapmaniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Assessing gaze behaviour during real-world tasks is difficult; dynamic bodies moving through dynamic worlds make gaze analysis difficult. Current approaches involve laborious coding of pupil positions. In settings where motion capture and mobile eye tracking are used concurrently in naturalistic tasks, it is critical that data collection be simple, efficient, and systematic. One solution is to combine eye tracking with motion capture to generate 3D gaze vectors. When combined with tracked or known object locations, 3D gaze vector generation can be automated. Here we use combined eye and motion capture and explore how linear regression models generate accurate 3D gaze vectors. We compare spatial accuracy of models derived from four short calibration routines across three pupil data inputs: the efficacy of calibration routines were assessed, a validation task requiring short fixations on taskrelevant locations, and a naturalistic object interaction task to bridge the gap between laboratory and "in the wild" studies. Further, we generated and compared models using spherical and cartesian coordinate systems and monocular (Left or Right) or binocular data. All calibration routines performed similarly, with the best performance (i.e., sub-centimetre errors) coming from the naturalistic task trials when the participant is looking at an object in front of them. We found that spherical coordinate systems generate the most accurate gaze vectors with no differences in accuracy when using monocular or binocular data. Overall, we recommend one-minute calibration routines using binocular pupil data combined with a spherical world coordinate system to produce the highest quality gaze vectors.

Citations
7
FWCI
0.49
Field percentile
top 34%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISMacInnes '18Au '26Aguirre '21Ehinger '19Dilbeck '23Méndez '26
72% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jeff MacInnes, Shariq Iqbal, John Pearson+1 more·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2018· 78 citations