Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Dynamic Network Analysis of Electrophysiological Task Data
Chetan GohiliD, Oliver KohliD, Rukuang HuangiD, Mats W.J. van EsiD, Ōiwi Parker JonesiD, Laurence Tudor HuntiD, Andrew J. QuinniD, Mark W. WoolrichiD
Abstract
An important approach for studying the human brain is to use functional neuroimaging combined with a task. In electrophysiological data this often involves a time-frequency analysis, in which recorded brain activity is time-frequency transformed and epoched around task events of interest, followed by trial-averaging of the power. Whilst this simple approach can reveal fast oscillatory dynamics, the brain regions are analysed one at a time. This causes difficulties for interpretation and a debilitating number of multiple comparisons. In addition, it is now recognised that the brain responds to tasks through the coordinated activity of networks of brain areas. As such, techniques that take a whole-brain network perspective are needed. Here, we show how the oscillatory task responses from conventional time-frequency approaches, can be represented more parsimoniously at the network level using two state-of-the-art methods: the HMM (Hidden Markov Model) and DyNeMo (Dynamic Network Modes). Both methods reveal frequency-resolved networks of oscillatory activity with millisecond resolution. Comparing DyNeMo, HMM and traditional oscillatory response analysis, we show DyNeMo can identify task activations/deactivations that the other approaches fail to detect. DyNeMo offers a powerful new method for analysing task data from the perspective of dynamic brain networks. HighlightsO_LIWe show how oscillatory task response analysis can be carried out at the network level using two state-of-the-art methods: the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and Dynamics Network Modes (DyNeMo). C_LIO_LIThe HMM and DyNeMo can identify oscillatory task responses that conventional time-frequency methods fail to detect. C_LIO_LIDyNeMo provides a more interpretable and precise network decomposition of the data compared to the HMM. C_LIO_LIThe dataset and (Python) scripts used to perform dynamic network analysis on task data are made publicly available. C_LI
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mixtures of large-scale dynamic functional brain network modes
Chetan Gohil, Evan Roberts, … Mark W. Woolrich·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2022
- Analysis of task-related MEG functional brain networks using dynamic mode decomposition
Hmayag Partamian, Judie Tabbal, … Fadi N. Karameh·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2022
- Connectome spectral analysis to track EEG task dynamics on a subsecond scale
Katharina Glomb, Joan Rué‐Queralt, … Patric Hagmann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2020
- Dynamics of task-related electrophysiological networks: a benchmarking study
Judie Tabbal, Aya Kabbara, … Mahmoud Hassan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2021
- Evidence for transient, uncoupled power and functional connectivity dynamics
Rukuang Huang, Chetan Gohil, Mark W. Woolrich·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2025
- Dynamic fMRI networks of emotion
Niels Janssen, Uriel KA Elvira, … Theo G.M. van Erp·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2025