BMC BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
The Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD): a rapid, open-source, interoperable tool to remove duplicate citations in biomedical systematic reviews.
Kaitlyn HairiD, Zsanett BahoriD, Malcolm Robert MacleodiD, Jing LiaoiD, Emily S. SenaiD
- Citations
- 103
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Abstract
BackgroundResearchers who perform systematic searches across multiple databases often identify duplicate publications. Identifying such duplicates ("deduplication") can be extremely time-consuming, but failure to remove these citations can, in the worst instance, lead to the wrongful inclusion of duplicate data. Many existing tools are not sensitive enough, lack interoperability with other tools, are not freely accessible, or are difficult to use without programming knowledge. Here, we report the performance of our Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator (ASySD), a novel tool to perform automated deduplication of systematic searches for biomedical reviews. MethodsWe evaluated ASySDs performance on 5 unseen biomedical systematic search datasets of various sizes (1,845 - 79,880 citations), which had been deduplicated by human reviewers. We compared the performance of ASySD with Endnotes automated deduplication option and with the Systematic Review Accelerator Deduplication Module (SRA-DM). ResultsASySD identified more duplicates than either SRA-DM or Endnote, with a sensitivity in different datasets of 0.95 to 0.99. The false-positive rate was comparable to human performance, with a specificity of 0.94-0.99. The tool took less than 1 hour to deduplicate all datasets. ConclusionsFor duplicate removal in biomedical systematic reviews, ASySD is a highly sensitive, reliable, and time-saving tool. It is open source and freely available online as both an R package and a user-friendly web application.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- RefDeduR: A text-normalization and decision-tree aided R package enabling accurate and high-throughput reference deduplication for large datasets
J. Shen, F. Ling, E. M. Hartmann·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2022
- The PDF Data Extractor (PDE) Pre-screening Tool Reduced the Manual Review Burden for Systematic Literature Reviews by Over 35% Through Automated High-Throughput Assessment of Full-Text Articles
E. Stricker, M. E. Scheurer·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2021
- revtools: An R package to support article screening for evidence synthesis
M. J. Westgate·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2019
- Auto-STEED: A data mining tool for automated extraction of experimental parameters and risk of bias items from in vivo publications
Wolfgang Emanuel Zürrer, Amelia Elaine Cannon, … Benjamin Victor Ineichen·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2023
- cadmus: a robust pipeline for scalable retrieval of full-text biomedical literature
Jamie Campbell, Antoine D. Lain, T. Ian Simpson·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- Are Machines-learning Methods More Efficient than Humans in Triaging Literature for Systematic Reviews?
Ṣẹ̀yẹ Abògúnr̀in, Luisa Queiros, … Andreas Witzmann·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2021