Identifying charismatic bird species and traits with community science observations
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWIdentifying which species are perceived as charismatic can improve the impact and efficiency of conservation outreach, as charismatic species receive more conservation funding and have their conservation needs prioritized (9; 17; 13). Sociological experiments studying animal charisma have relied on stated preferences to find correlations between hypothetical "willingness to pay" or "empathy" for a species conservation and species size, color, and aesthetic appeal (51; 13; 16). Recognizing the increasing availability of digital records of public engagement with animals that reveal preferences, an emerging field of "culturomics" uses Google search results, Wikipedia article activities, and other digital modes of engagement to identify charismatic species and traits (46; 31; 10; 41). In this study, we take advantage of community science efforts as another form of digital data that can reveal observer preferences. We apply a multi-stage analysis to ask whether opportunistic birders contributing to iNaturalist engage more with larger, more colorful, and rarer birds relative to a baseline, from eBird contributors, approximating unbiased detection. We find that body mass, color contrast, and range size all predict over-representation in the opportunistic dataset. We also find evidence that, across 473 modeled species, 52 species are significantly overreported and 158 are significantly underreported, indicating a wide variety of species-specific effects. Understanding which birds are charismatic can aid conservationists in creating impactful outreach materials and engaging new naturalists. The quantified differences between two prominent community science efforts may also be of use for researchers leveraging the data from one or both of them to answer scientific questions of interest.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Global Scientific and Public Interest in Birds and their Conservation
Haozhong Si, Stuart H. M. Butchart, … Enrico Di Minin·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2024
- Drab and distant birds are studied less than their fancy-feathered friends
S. E. Fischer, A. M. Lindsay, … H. M. Streby·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2023
- On the overlap between scientific and societal taxonomic attention - insights for conservation
I. Jaric, R. A. Correia, … F. Courchamp·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2018
- Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies
J. A. Tobias, A. L. Pigot·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2019
- Hotspot prioritizations show sensitivity to data type
K. E. A. Norman, E. P. White·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2019
- Shortcomings of shortcuts: common species cannot fully explain multiscale patterns of species richness
W. Scott Schwenk·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2025