BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
SummaryAUC: a tool for evaluating the performance of polygenic risk prediction models in validation datasets with only summary level statistics
Lei SongiD, Aiyi LiuiD, Jianxin ShiiD, Pablo V. GejmaniD, Alan R. SandersiD, Jubao DuaniD, Claude Robert CloningeriD, Dragan M. Švrakić, Nancy G. BuccolaiD, Douglas F. LevinsoniD, Bryan J. MowryiD, Robert FreedmaniD, Ann Olincy M. DiD, Farooq Amin M. D, Donald W. BlackiD, Jeremy M. Silverman, William ByerleyiD
Abstract
MotivationPolygenic risk score (PRS) methods based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have a potential for predicting the risk of developing complex diseases and are expected to become more accurate with larger training data sets and innovative statistical methods. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is often used to evaluate the performance of PRSs, which requires individual genotypic and phenotypic data in an independent GWAS validation dataset. We are motivated to develop methods for approximating AUC of PRSs based on the summary level data of the validation dataset, which will greatly facilitate the development of PRS models for complex diseases.\n\nResultsWe develop statistical methods and an R package SummaryAUC for approximating the AUC and its variance of a PRS when only the summary level data of the validation dataset are available. SummaryAUC can be applied to PRSs with SNPs either genotyped or imputed in the validation dataset. We examined the performance of SummaryAUC using a large-scale GWAS of schizophrenia. SummaryAUC provides accurate approximations to AUCs and their variances. The bias of AUC is typically less than 0.5% in most analyses. SummaryAUC cannot be applied to PRSs that use all SNPs in the genome because it is computationally prohibitive.\n\nAvailabilityhttps://github.com/lsncibb/SummaryAUC\n\nContactJianxin.Shi@nih.gov
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 23
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ensembled best subset selection using summary statistics for polygenic risk prediction
Tony Chen, Haoyu Zhang, … Xihong Lin·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2024
- Fine-tuning Polygenic Risk Scores with GWAS Summary Statistics
Zijie Zhao, Yanyao Yi, … Qiongshi Lu·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2019
- Overestimated Polygenic Prediction due to Overlapping Subjects in Genetic Datasets
David K. Park, Mingshen Chen, … Jong Hun Kim·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2022
- R2ROC: An efficient method of comparing two or more correlated AUC from out-of-sample prediction using polygenic scores
Md. Moksedul Momin, Naomi R. Wray, Sang Lee·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2024
- Optimizing and benchmarking polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics
Zijie Zhao, Tim Gruenloh, … Qiongshi Lu·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2024
- Efficient implementation of penalized regression for genetic risk prediction
Florian Privé, Hugues Aschard, Michaël G. B. Blum·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2019