Relating local connectivity and global dynamics in recurrent excitatory-inhibitory networks
Abstract
How the connectivity of cortical networks determines the neural dynamics and the resulting computations is one of the key questions in neuroscience. Previous works have pursued two complementary strategies to quantify the structure in connectivity, by specifying either the local statistics of connectivity motifs between small groups of neurons, or by defining network-wide low-rank patterns of connectivity that determine the resulting low-dimensional dynamics. A direct relationship between these two approaches is however currently missing, and in particular it remains to be clarified how local connectivity statistics are related to the global connectivity structure and shape the low-dimensional activity. To bridge this gap, here we develop a method for mapping local connectivity statistics onto an approximate global low-rank structure. Our method rests on approximating the global connectivity matrix using dominant eigenvectors, which we compute using perturbation theory for random matrices. This approach demonstrates that multi-population networks defined from local connectivity properties can in general be approximated by low-rank connectivity with Gaussian-mixture statistics. We specifically apply this method to excitatory-inhibitory networks, and show that it leads to accurate predictions for both the low-dimensional dynamics, and for the activity of individual neurons. Altogether, our approach allows us to disentangle the effects of mean connectivity and reciprocal motifs on the global recurrent feedback, and provides an intuitive picture of how local connectivity shapes global network dynamics. Author summaryThe structure of connections between neurons is believed to determine how cortical networks control behaviour. Current experimental methods typically measure connections between small numbers of simultaneously recorded neurons, and thereby provide information on statistics of local connectivity motifs. Collective network dynamics are however determined by network-wide patterns of connections. How these global patterns are related to local connectivity statistics and shape the dynamics is an open question that we address in this study. Starting from networks defined in terms of local statistics, we develop a method for approximating the resulting connectivity by global low-rank patterns. We apply this method to classical excitatory-inhibitory networks and show that it allows us to predict both collective and single-neuron activity. More generally, our approach provides a link between local connectivity statistics and global network dynamics.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mean-Field Equations For Neuronal Networks With Arbitrary Degree Distributions
Duane Q. Nykamp, Daniel Friedman, … Alex Roxin·Physical review. EPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2017
- From the statistics of connectivity to the statistics of spike times in neuronal networks
Gabriel Koch Ocker, Yu Hu, … Eric Shea‐Brown·Current Opinion in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2017
- Stochastic activity in low-rank recurrent neural networks
Francesca Mastrogiuseppe, Joana Carmona, Christian K. Machens·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2025
- Geometry of population activity in spiking networks with low-rank structure
Ljubica Cimeša, Lazar Ciric, Srdjan Ostojic·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2023
- The impact of sparsity in low-rank recurrent neural networks
Elizabeth Herbert, Srdjan Ostojic·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 9, 2022
- Dimensionality in recurrent spiking networks: global trends in activity and local origins in connectivity
Stefano Recanatesi, Gabriel Koch Ocker, … Eric Shea‐Brown·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 12, 2019