Breast Cancer ResearchGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Common variants in breast cancer risk loci predispose to distinct tumor subtypes
Thomas U. AhearniD, Haoyu ZhangiD, Kyriaki MichailidouiD, Roger Laughlin MilneiD, Manjeet K. BollaiD, Joe DennisiD, Alison M. DunningiD, Michael J. LushiD, Qin WangiD, Irene Louise AndrulisiD, Hoda Anton‐CulveriD, Volker ArndtiD, Kristan J. AronsoniD, Paul Livermore AueriD, Annelie AugustinssoniD, Adinda BateniD, Heiko BecheriD, Sabine BehrensiD, Javier J. BeniteziD, Marina BermishevaiD, CARL P. BLOMQVISTiD, Stig E. BojeseniD, Bernardo BonanniiD, Anne‐Lise Børresen‐DaleiD, Hiltrud B. BrauchiD, , Peter T. SimpsoniD
Abstract
BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple common breast cancer susceptibility variants. Many of these variants have differential associations by estrogen receptor (ER), but how these variants relate with other tumor features and intrinsic molecular subtypes is unclear. MethodsAmong 106,571 invasive breast cancer cases and 95,762 controls of European ancestry with data on 173 breast cancer variants identified in previous GWAS, we used novel two-stage polytomous logistic regression models to evaluate variants in relation to multiple tumor features (ER, progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and grade) adjusting for each other, and to intrinsic-like subtypes. ResultsEighty-five of 173 variants were associated with at least one tumor feature (false discovery rate <5%), most commonly ER and grade, followed by PR and HER2. Models for intrinsic-like subtypes found nearly all of these variants (83 of 85) associated at P<0.05 with risk for at least one luminal-like subtype, and approximately half (41 of 85) of the variants were associated with risk of at least one non-luminal subtype, including 32 variants associated with triple-negative (TN) disease. Ten variants were associated with risk of all subtypes in different magnitude. Five variants were associated with risk of luminal A-like and TN subtypes in opposite directions. ConclusionThis report demonstrates a high level of complexity in the etiology heterogeneity of breast cancer susceptibility variants and can inform investigations of subtype-specific risk prediction.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 33
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genome-wide association study identifies 32 novel breast cancer susceptibility loci from overall and subtype-specific analyses
Haoyu Zhang, Thomas U. Ahearn, … Peter Hillemanns·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2020
- Identification and Characterization of Rare Pathogenic Genetic Variants Associated with Breast Cancer Susceptibility in 1000 Genome and gnomAD Population
Kanishk Yadav, Abhishek Prasad·medRxiv·Aug 30, 2025
- Association of Gene Variant Type and Location with Breast Cancer Risk in the General Population
Mwangala P. Akamandisa, Nicholas James Boddicker, … Katherine L. Nathanson·Annals of OncologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2025
- Reparameterization of PAM50 expression identifies novel breast tumor dimensions and leads to discovery of a breast cancer susceptibility locus at 12q15
Michael J. Madsen, Stacey Knight, … Nicola J. Camp·Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2018
- Identification of Novel Common Breast Cancer Risk Variants in Latinas at the 6q25 Locus
Joshua Hoffman, Laura Fejerman, … Elad Ziv·Breast Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2019
- Profile of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among Bangladeshi Women - Audit of Initial Experience
M. Z. RAHMAN, M. A. Karim·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2018