Journal of VisionNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Cues for predictive eye movements in naturalistic scenes
Alexander GoettkeriD, Nils Borgerding, Linus Leeske, Karl R. GegenfurtneriD
Abstract
We previously compared following of the same trajectories with eye movements, but either as an isolated target or embedded in a naturalistic scene, in this case the movement of a puck in an ice hockey game. We observed that the oculomotor system was able to leverage the contextual cues available in the naturalistic scene to produce predictive eye movements. In this study we wanted to assess which factors are critical for achieving this predictive advantage by manipulating four factors: the expertise of the viewers, the amount of available peripheral information, and contextual and kinematic cues. The more peripheral information became available (by manipulating the area of the video that was visible), the better the predictions of all observers. However, expert ice hockey fans were consistently more accurate and better at predicting than novices and also benefitted more from additional peripheral information. Artificial contextual cues about the position of the players did not lead to a predictive advantage, whereas impairing the causal structure of kinematic cues by playing the video in reverse led to a severe impairment. When the videos were flipped vertically to introduce more difficult kinematic cues, predictive behavior was comparable to when observers watching the original videos. Together, these results demonstrate that when contextual information is available in naturalistic scenes, the oculomotor system is successfully integrating them, and is not only relying on low-level information about the target trajectory. Critical factors for successful prediction seem to be the amount of available information, experience with the stimuli and the availability of intact kinematic cues for player movements.
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Field percentile
- top 27%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mechanisms for action prediction operate differently in observers with motor experience
Lincoln John Colling, William Forde Thompson, John David Sutton·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2018
- Task demands and visual context naturalness modulate gravitational expectation during ocular tracking of temporarily occluded ballistic trajectories
Sergio Delle Monache, Pietro Nastasi, … Gianfranco Bosco·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2026
- Dynamic Prediction During Perception of Everyday Events
Michelle L. Eisenberg, Jeffrey M. Zacks, Shaney E. Flores·Cognitive Research Principles and ImplicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2018
- Do we predict upcoming speech content in naturalistic environments?
Evelien Heyselaar, David Peeters, Peter Hagoort A·Language Cognition and NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2020
- Eye tracking insights into movement preparation and execution under nonstandard visual movement feedback
Felix Quirmbach, Jens R. Helmert, … Jakub Limanowski·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2026
- Prediction and information integration determine subtle anticipatory fixation biases
Giuseppe Notaro, Wieske van Zoest, … Uri Hasson·bioRxiv·Jan 25, 2018