bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Low dimensional latent structure underlying the choices of mice
Sebastian A. BruijnsiD, Maria Katharina EcksteiniD, Peter DayaniD
Abstract
An impressive wealth of cognitive neuroscience tasks involves combining perceptual information with an estimate of the latent state of the environment to make a decision. Such tasks have driven the development of theoretically-motivated cognitive models which offer compactly parameterised, and thereby insightful, accounts of the internal processes by which this might happen. However, the very large amounts of data that can now be collected present a challenge and an opportunity for this frame-work. The challenge is that these models can be shown to underfit the data systematically (Nassar & Frank, 2016; Palminteri, Wyart, & Koechlin, 2017; Wilson & Collins, 2019) - particularly in how they characterise the effect of the latent state estimate. But this opens up the opportunity to extend the framework and employ richer, more highly parameterised and flexible models, in a data-driven manner (Dezfouli, Griffiths, Ramos, Dayan, & Balleine, 2019). Unfortunately, it is tremendously difficult to interpret these models, precisely because of their flexibility. Here, we follow a recent approach (Eckstein, Summerfield, Daw, & Miller, 2024), in which components of compact models are progressively replaced with more flexible homologues, but, where possible, the resulting insights are mapped back into theoretically-transparent forms. We prove the effectiveness of our scheme by applying it to one of the largest available decision-making data sets for mice - more than 300,000 choices from 139 subjects studied by the International Brain Lab (The International Brain Laboratory et al., 2021). We found widely generalisable phenomena such as notable effects of continual fluctuations in task engagement and systematic differences between learning and forgetting of chosen and unchosen options in determining the subjective state estimate. Our results show that combining theory-driven and data-driven methods can reveal cognitive processes that would have been difficult to discover using either method on its own.
- organism: mouse
- assay: behavioral assay
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Internal states emerge early during learning of a perceptual decision-making task
Lenca Cuturela, Jonathan W. Pillow·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2024
- From predictive models to cognitive models: Separable behavioral processes underlying reward learning in the rat
K. J. Miller, M. M. Botvinick, C. D. Brody·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2021
- Identifying the factors governing internal state switches during nonstationary sensory decision-making
Zeinab Mohammadi, Zoe C. Ashwood, Jonathan W. Pillow·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2025
- Decoding mouse behavior to explain single-trial decisions and their relationship with neural activity.
Yves Weissenberger, Andrew J. King, Johannes C Dahmen·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2019
- Hidden-state inference aligns attention and neural representational geometry during flexible behaviour
Casper Kerrén, Stephanie Theves, … Christian F. Doeller·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2025
- Cognitive Model Discovery via Disentangled RNNs
Kevin J. Miller, Maria Katharina Eckstein, … Zeb L. Kurth-Nelson·neural information processing systemsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023