bioRxivEcology
Community structure ecosystem function relationships in the Congo Basin methane cycle depend on the physiological scale of function
K. M. Meyer, A. M. Hopple, A. M. Klein, A. M. H. Morris, S. Bridgham, B. J. M. Bohannan
Abstract
Belowground ecosystem processes can be highly variable and difficult to predict using microbial community data. Here we argue that this stems from at least three issues: 1) complex covariance structure of samples (with environmental conditions or spatial proximity) can make distinguishing biotic drivers a challenge, 2) communities can control ecosystem processes through multiple mechanisms, making the identification of these controls a challenge and 3) ecosystem function assessments can be broad in physiological scale, encapsulating multiple processes with unique microbially mediated controls. We test these assertions using methane (CH4)-cycling processes in soil samples collected along a wetland-to-upland habitat gradient in the Congo Basin. We perform our measurements of function under controlled laboratory conditions and include environmental covariates in statistical analyses to aid in identifying biotic drivers. We divide measurements of microbial communities into four attributes (abundance, activity, composition, and diversity) that represent different forms of community control. Lastly, our process measurements differ in physiological scale, including broader processes (gross methanogenesis and methanotrophy) that involve more mediating groups, to finer processes (hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and high-affinity CH4 oxidation) with fewer mediating groups. We observed that finer scale processes can be more readily predicted from microbial community structure than broader scale processes. In addition, the nature of those relationships differed, with broad processes limited by abundance while fine-scale processes were associated with diversity and composition. These findings demonstrate the importance of carefully defining the physiological scale of ecosystem function and performing community measurements that represent the range of possible controls on ecosystem processes.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Experimental erosion of microbial diversity decreases soil CH4 consumption rates
E. Schnyder, P. L. E. Bodelier, … P. A. Niklaus·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2020
- Linking microbial communities to ecosystem functions: what we can learn from genotype-phenotype mapping in organisms
A. H. Morris, K. M. Meyer, B. J. Bohannan·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2019
- Seasonal dynamics of methane cycling microbial communities in Amazonian floodplain sediments.
J. B. Gontijo, A. M. Venturini, … S. M. Tsai·bioRxiv·May 4, 2020
- Small- and large-scale patches shape benthic microbial community structure and function in streams at the subcontinental scale
Richard LaBrie, Rebecca L. Maher, … Shannon L. Speir·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2025
- Biogenic methane cycling is controlled by microbial cohorts
R. Mondav, G. Martin, … S. L. Garcia·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2022
- Negative biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship in broad but not in narrow functions within pitcher plant microbial communities
Catalina Cuellar‐Gempeler, José Alejandro Bravo, … Megan Teigen·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2025