Accounting for spatial interactions in the upscaling of ecosystem services
Andrea Larissa BoesingiD, Gaëtane Le ProvostiD, Margot NeyretiD, Anja LinstädteriD, Javier MuroiD, Jörg MülleriD, Kirsten JungiD, Markus FischeriD, Maximilian LangeiD, Olena DubovykiD, Paul MagdoniD, Ralph BolligeriD, Sophia LeimeriD, Steffen BochiD, Swen C. RenneriD, Till KleinebeckeriD, Ute HameriD, Valentin H. KlausiD, Wolfgang WilckeiD, Peter ManningiD
Abstract
O_LIMaps of ecosystem service (ES) supply are frequently used to guide spatial planning, policy making, and ecosystem management. However, these are typically based upon coarse land-cover proxies. This approach lacks a strong mechanistic basis, and neglects spatial biodiversity dynamics and interactions among landscape properties that can modify ES provision. C_LIO_LIWe present an analytical framework for ES upscaling that incorporates spatial interactions between landscape properties to determine ES supply. The resulting models can be viewed as a spatially informed ES production function. The approach comprises seven steps that include several elements absent from most existing approaches, notably a procedure for identifying geodata variables that represent the true mechanistic drivers, the inclusion of spatial interactions in the upscaling model, and modification following expert feedback on the selected model. C_LIO_LIWe demonstrate the approach using two example ES from German grasslands: biodiversity conservation and water supply. We show that the inclusion of spatial interactions in the upscaling model improved model predictions from 15% to 33% depending on the ES evaluated. In addition, inclusion of spatial interactions led to reduced error associated with the upscaled estimates. C_LIO_LIBy overcoming several shortcomings of existing, upscaling approaches we generate resulting maps of ES supply that can more reliably inform spatial planning Further, the underlying models allow for simulation of changes in the drivers of ES supply and estimation of respective outcomes. These advantages have the potential to better link detailed local-scale ecological understanding and land management with large-scale ES supply mapping, and thus better inform decision making and spatial planning. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mapping the functional connectivity of ecosystem services supply across a regional landscape
R. D. Field, L. Parrott·bioRxiv·May 20, 2021
- Consistent trade-offs in ecosystem services between land covers with different production intensities
C. Gómez-Creutzberg, M. Lagisz, … J. M. Tylianakis·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2020
- One cannot have it all: trading-off ecosystem services and biodiversity bundles in landscape connectivity restoration
Margot Neyret, Daniel Rex Richards, … Sandra Lavorel·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2024
- A predictive model of fractional land use
S. Kapitza, N. Golding, B. A. Wintle·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2020
- A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services
Heera Lee, Sven Lautenbach·Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2016
- Disentangling effects of climate and land use on biodiversity and ecosystem services - a multi-scale experimental design
S. Redlich, J. Zhang, … I. Steffan-Dewenter·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2021