Molecular Biology and EvolutionEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Genetic and anatomical determinants of olfaction in dogs and wild canids
Alice MoutoniD, Deborah BirdiD, Gang LiiD, Brent A. CraveniD, Jonathan M LevineiD, Marco MorselliiD, Matteo A. PellegriniiD, Blaire Van ValkenburghiD, Robert K. WayneiD, William J. MurphyiD
Abstract
Understanding the anatomical and genetic basis of complex phenotypic traits has long been a challenge for biological research. Domestic dogs offer a compelling model as they demonstrate more phenotypic variation than any other vertebrate species. Dogs have been intensely selected for specific traits and abilities, directly or indirectly, over the past 15,000 years since their initial domestication from the gray wolf. Because olfaction plays a central role in critical tasks, such as the detection of drugs, diseases, and explosives, as well as human rescue, we compared relative olfactory capacity across dog breeds and assessed changes to the canine olfactory system resulting from domestication. We conducted a cross-disciplinary survey of olfactory anatomy, olfactory receptor (OR) gene variation, and OR gene expression in domestic dogs. Through comparisons to their closest wild canid relatives, the gray wolf and coyote, we show that domestic dogs might have lost functional OR genes commensurate with a documented reduction in nasal morphology during domestication. Critically, within domestic dogs alone, we found no genetic or morphological profile shared among functional or genealogical breed groupings, such as scent hounds, that might indicate evidence of any human-directed selection for enhanced olfaction. Instead, our results suggest that superior scent detection dogs likely owe their success to advantageous behavioral traits and training rather than an "olfactory edge" provided by morphology or genes.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of village dog and wolf genomes highlights the pivotal role of the neural crest in dog domestication
A. L. Pendleton, F. Shen, … J. M. Kidd·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2018
- Olfactory detection and discrimination in domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
E. Ferrando, C. D. Dahl·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2022
- Morphology does not covary with predicted behavioural correlations of the domestication syndrome in dogs
C. Hansen Wheat, W. van der Bijl, C. W. Wheat·bioRxiv·Aug 30, 2019
- Cooperative Communication with Humans Evolved to Emerge Early in Dogs
H. Salomons, K. Smith, … B. Hare·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2021
- Intrinsically ball retrieving wolf puppies reveal standing ancestral variation for human-directed play behaviour
C. Hansen Wheat, H. Temrin·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2019
- Dogs, but not wolves, lose their sensitivity towards novelty with age
C. Hansen Wheat, W. van der Bijl, H. Temrin·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2019