bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
Species-specific small models for cell type classification approach the performance of large single cell foundation models
Gita MahmoudabadiiD, Lakshmi KrishnaniD, Tejaswini GanapathiiD, James Pearce, Steve R. Quake, Theofanis KaraletsosiD
Abstract
Accurate cross-species cell type classification remains a key evaluation task in single-cell transcriptomics. Recent foundation models trained on millions of single-cell profiles demonstrate great in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance on this task, but their large parameter counts and substantial computational costs limit accessibility and interpretability. Here, we introduce CytoType, a simple and interpretable model for cell type classification that leverages pre-trained ESM-2 protein embeddings of protein-coding transcripts. By learning linear, cell-type-specific weights over transcript embeddings, without relying on gene count information, CytoType achieves F1 scores comparable to or exceeding those of large-scale transformer-based models. We further developed ESM-Cell Embedding (ESM-CE), an even simpler variant that only averages ESM-2 embeddings across expressed genes, which also performs competitively against foundation models. Both CytoType and ESM-CE are trained on species-specific data, maintaining high accuracy when classifying cell types with orders of magnitude fewer parameters compared to larger foundation models. For example, for human tissues, the average performance gap between CytoType and the best foundation model was 0.053 F1 points while CytoType uses 10,000x fewer trainable parameters. Additionally, we quantified the contribution of ESM-2 embeddings to cell type classification tasks and demonstrated a three fold reduction in the performance gap between CytoType and the best foundation model for nine species. Finally, we show that CytoTypes learned gene weights are biologically interpretable.
- organism: human
- organism: multiple species
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- approach: transformer / foundation model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Fundamental Limitations of Foundation Models in Single-Cell Transcriptomics
Srijan Atti, Shankar Subramaniam·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2025
- Benchmarking single-cell foundation models in a zero-shot setting
Yasmine Gaballa, Somaia Ahmed, Tamim Abdelaal·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2026
- Benchmarking single-cell foundation models reveals an advantage in the low-data regime for cell-type and disease-state prediction
Haya Benhayon, Michael M. Danziger, … Michal Rosen‐Zvi·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- Parameter-free representations outperform single-cell foundation models on downstream benchmarks
Huan Souza, Pankaj Mehta·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2026
- Large Scale Foundation Model on Single-cell Transcriptomics
Minsheng Hao, Jing Gong, … Le Song·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2024
- Consequences of training data composition for deep learning models in single-cell biology
Ajay Nadig, Akshaya Thoutam, … Lorin A. Crawford·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2025