bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
Abstract
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is widespread and variable in nature. Although female-biased SSD predominates among insects, the proximate ecological and evolutionary factors promoting this phenomenon remain largely unstudied. Here, we employ modern phylogenetic comparative methods on 8 subfamilies of Iberian grasshoppers (85 species) to examine the validity of different models of evolution of body size and SSD and explore how they are shaped by a suite of ecological variables (habitat specialization, substrate use, altitude) and/or constrained by different evolutionary pressures (female fecundity, strength of sexual selection, length of the breeding season). Body size disparity primarily accumulated late in the history of the group and did not follow a Brownian motion pattern, indicating the existence of directional evolution for this trait. We found support for the converse of Renschs rule across all taxa but not within the two most speciose subfamilies (Gomphocerinae and Oedipodinae), which showed an isometric pattern. Our results do not provide support for the fecundity or sexual selection hypotheses and we did not find evidence for significant effects of habitat use. Contrary to that expected, we found that species with narrower reproductive window are less dimorphic in size than those that exhibit a longer breeding cycle, suggesting that male protandry cannot solely account for the evolution of female-biased SSD in Orthoptera. Our study highlights the need to consider alternatives to the classical evolutionary hypotheses when trying to explain why in certain insect groups males remain small.
- organism: multiple species
- research focus: ecology & biodiversity
- approach: comparative / phylogenetic analysis
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sexual selection and flight as predictors of sexual size and shape dimorphism in stick and leaf insects
Romain Boisseau, Sven Bradler, Douglas J. Emlen·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2025
- Sexual size dimorphism increases with body size at the intraspecific level in Drosophila melanogaster
Yang Zhang, Quanquan Jin, Xinqiang Xi·Ecological EntomologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2026
- Spiders bring new insight into the eco-evolutionary drivers of body size variation and sexual size dimorphism in arthropods
Camille Ameline, Denis Lafage, … Julien Pétillon·Journal of BiogeographyPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2026
- The macroevolutionary dynamics of mammalian sexual size dimorphism
M. E. Jones, C. Sheard·bioRxiv·May 31, 2023
- Sexual size dimorphism correlates with the number of androgen response in mammals, but only in small-bodied species
Caleb R. Ghione, Matthew D. Dean·Genome Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2025
- Sex-Specific Plasticity Explains Genetic Variation in Sexual Size Dimorphism in Drosophila
I. Vea, A. S. Wilcox, … A. W. Shingleton·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2021