Ecological EntomologyEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Sexual size dimorphism increases with body size at the intraspecific level in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD), the difference in body size between males and females, typically conforms to Renschs rule across species: SSD increases with body size when males are larger but decreases when females are larger. Although this macroevolutionary pattern has been extensively documented, intraspecific analyses remain rare, yet they are essential for understanding the proximate mechanisms underlying the origin and maintenance of sexual dimorphism. In particular, it remains unclear whether within-species variation in SSD is driven primarily by sex-specific differences in growth rate or in development time. Here, we addressed this question by examining SSD scaling in inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster from the well-established Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) reared under two thermal environments (25 {degrees}C and 28 {degrees}C). Females were consistently larger than males, resulting in pronounced female-biased SSD across different lines of this model insect. Moreover, SSD increased with overall body size, representing a reversal of Renschs rule at the intraspecific level. This scaling pattern was largely explained by higher female growth rates rather than sexual differences in development time. Elevated temperature reduced SSD by decreasing female growth rate while slightly enhancing that of males. Together, our results demonstrate that Renschs rule does not universally apply at intraspecific level and underscore the critical role of growth rate and environmental sensitivity in shaping SSD at the intraspecific level.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 3th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sex-Specific Plasticity Explains Genetic Variation in Sexual Size Dimorphism in Drosophila
I. Vea, A. S. Wilcox, … A. W. Shingleton·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2021
- Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
V. Garcia-Navas, V. Noguerales, … J. Ortego·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2017
- Sexual selection and flight as predictors of sexual size and shape dimorphism in stick and leaf insects
Romain Boisseau, Sven Bradler, Douglas J. Emlen·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2025
- The macroevolutionary dynamics of mammalian sexual size dimorphism
M. E. Jones, C. Sheard·bioRxiv·May 31, 2023
- The influence of adaptation to life at high-altitude on condition dependent sexual shape and size dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster
M. Pesevski, I. Dworkin·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2021
- Beyond size dimorphism: the past, present, and future of Rensch's Rule
Ken S. Toyama·The American NaturalistPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2025