Genetic EpidemiologyGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Some Statistical Consideration in Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies
Haoran XueiD, Wei PaniD, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) has become popular in integrating a reference eQTL dataset with an independent main GWAS dataset to identify (putatively) causal genes, shedding mechanistic insights to biological pathways from genetic variants to a GWAS trait mediated by gene expression. Statistically TWAS is a (two-sample) 2-stage least squares (2SLS) method in the framework of instrumental variables analysis for causal inference: in Stage 1 it uses the reference eQTL data to impute a genes expression for the main GWAS data, then in Stage 2 it tests for association between the imputed gene expression and the GWAS trait; if an association is detected in Stage 2, a (putatively) causal relationship between the gene and the GWAS trait is claimed. If a non-linear model or a generalized linear model (GLM) is fitted in Stage 2 (e.g. for a binary GWAS trait), it is known that using only imputed gene expression, as in standard TWAS, in general does not lead to a consistent (i.e. asymptotically unbiased) estimate for the causal effect; accordingly, a variation of 2SLS, called two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI), has been proposed to yield better estimates (e.g. being consistent under suitable conditions). Our main goal is to investigate whether it is necessary or even better to apply 2SRI, instead of the standard 2SLS. In addition, due to the use of imputed gene expression (i.e. with measurement errors), it is known that in general some correction to the standard error estimate of the causal effect estimate has to be applied, while in the standard TWAS no correction is applied. Is this an issue? We also compare one-sample 2SLS with two-sample 2SLS (i.e. the standard TWAS). We used the ADNI data and simulated data mimicking the ADNI data to address the above questions. At the end, we conclude that, in practice with the large sample sizes and small effect sizes of genetic variants, the standard TWAS performs well and is recommended.
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: eQTL / molecular QTL mapping
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On the interpretation of transcriptome-wide association studies
Christiaan de Leeuw, Josefin Werme, … Daniëlle Posthuma·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2023
- Modeling prediction error improves power of transcriptome-wide association studies
Kunal Bhutani, Abhishek Sarkar, … Nicholas J. Schork·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2017
- A TWAS method calibrated for the uncertainty of predicted expression
Arunabha Majumdar, Tanushree Haldar·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2026
- Knockoff procedure improves causal gene identifications in conditional transcriptome-wide association studies
Xiangyu Zhang, Lijun Wang, … Hongyu Zhao·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2025
- Transcriptome-wide association studies: opportunities and challenges
Michael Wainberg, Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong, … Anshul Bharat Kundaje·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 29, 2019
- Adjusting for genetic confounders in transcriptome-wide association studies leads to reliable detection of causal genes
Siming Zhao, Wesley L. Crouse, … Xin He·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2022