Experimental Brain ResearchNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Tactile spatial discrimination on the torso using vibrotactile and force stimulation
Atena Fadaei JouybariiD, Matteo FranzaiD, Oliver Alan KannapeiD, Masayuki HaraiD, Olaf BlankeiD
Abstract
There is a steadily growing number of mobile communication systems that provide spatially encoded tactile information to the humans torso. However, the increased use of such hands-off displays is currently not matched with or supported by systematic perceptual characterization of tactile spatial discrimination on the torso. Furthermore, there are currently no data testing spatial discrimination for dynamic force stimuli applied to the torso. In the present study, we measured tactile point localization (PL) and tactile direction discrimination (DD) on the thoracic spine using two unisex torso-worn tactile vests realized with arrays of 3x3 vibrotactile or force feedback actuators. We aimed to, firstly, evaluate and compare the spatial discrimination of vibrotactile and force stimulations on the thoracic spine and, secondly, to investigate the relationship between the PL and DD results across stimulations. Thirty-four healthy participants performed both tasks with both vests. Tactile accuracies for vibrotactile and force stimulations were 60.7% and 54.6% for the PL task; 71.0% and 67.7% for the DD task, respectively. Performance correlated positively with both stimulations, although accuracies were higher for the vibrotactile than for the force stimulation across tasks, arguably due to specific properties of vibrotactile stimulations. We observed comparable directional anisotropies in the PL results for both stimulations; however, anisotropies in the DD task were only observed with vibrotactile stimulations. We discuss our findings with respect to tactile perception research as well as their implications for the design of high-resolution torso-mounted tactile displays for spatial cueing.
- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Field percentile
- top 20%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Temporal Phase Differences Encode Tactile Motion from Static Vibrotactile Inputs
Erfan Rezaei, Mehdi Adibi·bioRxiv·May 19, 2026
- The Limits of Touch: Spatial acuity for frequency-resolved air-borne ultrasound vibrotactile stimuli
Antonio Cataldo, William Frier, Patrick Haggard·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2023
- Spatial and Temporal Influences on Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli on The Arm
Valay A. Shah, Maura Casadio, … Leigh Ann Mrotek·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 7, 2019
- Directional biases in whole hand motion perception revealed by mid-air tactile stimulation
Marlou Nadine Perquin, Mason Taylor, … James Kolasinski·CortexPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2021
- Vibrotactile stimulation on the upper back requires stronger vibration during goal-directed reaching but does not impede reaching performance
Alice Elizabeth Atkin, Bernard Marius ’t Hart, … Denise Y. P. Henriques·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2026
- Spatial localisation of touch on a robotic limb in the absence of direct haptic feedback
Celia Foster, Martina Giancane, … Tamar R. Makin·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2026